Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-run checks path on host before running on container

2014-11-23 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 02:40:29AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:14:32AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 02:47:49PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Peter Hutterer > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-run checks path on host before running on container

2014-11-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:14:32AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 02:47:49PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Peter Hutterer > > wrote: > > > I was playing around with systemd-nspawn and systemd-run. The latter > >

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-run checks path on host before running on container

2014-11-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 02:47:49PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Peter Hutterer > wrote: > > I was playing around with systemd-nspawn and systemd-run. The latter doesn't > > seem to let me run a command that solely exists on the container. > > simple way o

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-run checks path on host before running on container

2014-11-22 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > I was playing around with systemd-nspawn and systemd-run. The latter doesn't > seem to let me run a command that solely exists on the container. > simple way of reproducing: drop a file foo into the container, then on the > host run > >

[systemd-devel] systemd-run checks path on host before running on container

2014-11-20 Thread Peter Hutterer
I was playing around with systemd-nspawn and systemd-run. The latter doesn't seem to let me run a command that solely exists on the container. simple way of reproducing: drop a file foo into the container, then on the host run systemd-run -M mycontainer /path/to/foo I expected this to run fo