Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and LSB Required/Should-Stop

2011-07-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 28.06.11 12:54, Ville Skyttä (ville.sky...@iki.fi) wrote: > > On 06/27/2011 04:18 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fri, 24.06.11 14:04, Ville Skyttä (ville.sky...@iki.fi) wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> Am I right that systemd does currently have no support for the LSB > >> Required

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and LSB Required/Should-Stop

2011-06-28 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 06/27/2011 04:18 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 24.06.11 14:04, Ville Skyttä (ville.sky...@iki.fi) wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Am I right that systemd does currently have no support for the LSB >> Required-Stop and Should-Stop keywords? If yes, are there plans to >> support them in the f

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and LSB Required/Should-Stop

2011-06-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 24.06.11 14:04, Ville Skyttä (ville.sky...@iki.fi) wrote: > Hello, > > Am I right that systemd does currently have no support for the LSB > Required-Stop and Should-Stop keywords? If yes, are there plans to > support them in the future? That is true, we do not support this right now. In

[systemd-devel] systemd and LSB Required/Should-Stop

2011-06-24 Thread Ville Skyttä
Hello, Am I right that systemd does currently have no support for the LSB Required-Stop and Should-Stop keywords? If yes, are there plans to support them in the future? The use case I have is in Fedora's vdr package: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=vdr.git . The init script's stop actio