On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> ---
> Makefile.am | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index 9b769ee..397a71c 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -2596,7 +2596,7 @@ $(systemd_boot_so
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> On 8 April 2015 at 18:47, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
>> wrote:
>>> ---
>>> Makefile.am | 3 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 delet
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> On 8 April 2015 at 19:03, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
>> wrote:
>>> ---
>>> Makefile.am | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 del
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:11:58PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> +TEST=="../../../sensitivity", ENV{POINTINGSTICK_SENSITIVITY}!="", \
>> + ATTR{../../../sensitivity}="$env{POINTINGSTICK_SENSITIVITY}"
>>
>> LABEL="pointingstick_end"
>
> hm
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> On 8 April 2015 at 19:46, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
>> wrote:
>>> On 8 April 2015 at 18:47, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:54 P
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> On 8 April 2015 at 20:02, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
>> wrote:
>>> On 8 April 2015 at 19:46, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:34 P
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Marc-Antoine Perennou
wrote:
> Well, on one hand, we may have the need for multilib stuff to find the
> native binaries, as you said.
>
> On the other hand we have my case. Just a bit of background so that
> you understand where these patches come from:
> I'm develo
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 16.03.15 11:29, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
>>
>> I would like to pass the time it was spent in bootloader to systemd.
>> Is there a kernel command line to pass this information on non EFI
>> bootloader? Or
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>> We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
>> past. A file system like ext234 is clearly not the future,
>
> A filesystem like ext is being actively developed,maintained and new
> features being added to i
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> From: Matthew Garrett
>
> PCI power management seems to work fine on Intel HDA controllers, so let's
> turn that on. We can expand this to other vendors based on user feedback.
> +ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="pci", ATTR{class}=="0x040300",
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> (Resending from the correct address)
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 07:51:26PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
>> It looks like an unconditional static assignment.
>>
>> Why should udev carry this? We generally
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Ido Barkan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am VDSM developer in the Ovirt project.
>
> We are implementing support for SR-IOV network cards. Afer the changing of
> the number of VFs on the card and programmatically querying for all links
> (we use libnl for this) we observ
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:11 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:37:31PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> I'm not convinced that any such broad matches for power management
>>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 14.04.15 22:01, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
>
> I added some more logging (so that automount_dispatch_expire() can
> never fail without this being logged) and applied it!
>
> I only gave this superficial tes
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
> Under certain conditions, I discovered that commands like `udevadm
> control --exit` or `systemctl stop systemd-udevd` (with the sockets
> stopped beforehand) will kill udevd before it finish its jobs which
> triggered by `udevadm trigger` (I presu
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 24.08.14 06:49, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> >> This should be the value of ID_PATH property, not sysfs path. Check with
>> >>
>> >> udevadm info --query
>> >> property
>> >> /sys/devices/ocp.3/4740.us
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 22.08.14 10:13, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> > Polluting my log this way. Is is possible to inhibit that behavior? Maybe
>> > trying a couple of times, then giving up until next network status change.
>>
>>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Simon McVittie
> wrote:
>> I recently opened this Debian bug, for which I attach a
>> patch that seems to work. Bug report quoted in full below.
>>
>> I would appreciate udev ma
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> ---
> src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c | 14 +-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedeskto
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> ---
> src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> The kernel timestamp (recv_time) is made earlier than current time
> (now_ts), use the timestamp captured before sending packet directly.
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
sys
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> NTPv4 servers don't reply with unsynchronized status when they lost
> synchronization, they only keep increasing the root dispersion and it's
> up to the client to decide at which point they no longer consider it
> synchronized.
>
> Ignore
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> The shortest time constant that is stable with the kernel PLL (compiled
> with SHIFT_PLL=2) is about log2 of update interval - 3. Set the constant
> to poll - 2 to make room for one missed update.
Experimentation did show, that the adjust
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> After receiving a reply from the server, allow two missed replies before
> switching to another server to avoid unnecessary clock hopping when
> packets are getting lost in the network.
Hmm, what's the reason to do this? The servers in th
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> ---
> src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
It did not apply without the earlier patch and in systemd we try to
avoid using ! to test integers for 0. Added the fix.
Thanks,
Kay
__
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> When all servers are exhausted, wait for one poll interval before trying
> to connect again to the first server in the list. Also, keep increasing
> the polling interval to make sure a client not getting any valid replies
> will not send r
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Actually we try to be compatible with kernels from the last 2y, which
> would mean 3.5 as minimum version. (though we will make an exception
> when we adopt kdbus...)
>
> The README currently even states 3.0 was supported... Maybe we sh
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Updated patch which the correct version information.
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-d
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Zhenzhong Duan
wrote:
> Cpu doesn't get online automaticly after hotplug when we test guest cpu
> add/remove in xen env.
>
> I don't have an baremetal env to test this, but I think it's same.
>
> The rule is missed in systemd but exist in legacy udev.
Udev is not a
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Zhenzhong Duan
wrote:
> On 2014-9-2 13:55, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Zhenzhong Duan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Cpu doesn't get online automaticly after hotplug when we test guest cpu
>&g
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:01 AM, John Haxby wrote:
>
> On 2 Sep 2014, at 06:55, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Zhenzhong Duan
>> wrote:
>>> Cpu doesn't get online automaticly after hotplug when we test guest cpu
>>> ad
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar
>> wrote:
>> > After receiving a reply from the server, allow two missed replies before
>> &g
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 06:45:24PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar
>> wrote:
>> > When all servers are exhausted, wait for one poll interval before trying
>> &
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 06:38:49PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Miroslav Lichvar
>> wrote:
>> > ---
>> > src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c | 3 ++-
>> > 1
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:32:37PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>> >> There is also some code in src/timesync/timesyncd-manager.c +209:
>> >>
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
> John Haxby wrote on 02/09/14 10:31:
>> Col, forgive my ignorance, but cpuadd@$name.service seems to imply that
>> you'd have one file or symlink per CPU. That's going to be unwieldy
>> when you have hundreds of CPUs isn't it?
>
> Not quite.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:30 PM, John Haxby wrote:
> On 02/09/14 16:23, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>>>
>>> John Haxby wrote on 02/09/14 10:31:
>>>> Col, forgive my ignorance, but cpuadd@$name.service seems to
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:27:37AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:01 AM, John Haxby wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2 Sep 2014, at 06:55, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> >
>> >>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:04 PM, John Haxby wrote:
> On 02/09/14 16:42, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> > Either the kernel has to provide a mechanism for the userspace to
>>> > control onlining, or do it itself and provide a mechanism to prevent
>>> > automatic onl
- Original Message -
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:33:54PM +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 16:58 +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > > Hi Maurizio,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Maurizio Lombardi
> > > wrote:
> > > > This patch changes the naming
- Original Message -
> > We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
> > scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code, we only
> > fix obvious bugs.
>
> Fine with me, however not sure what our story should be for years to come
> regarding SCSI stuff downst
- Original Message -
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 01:55:09PM -0400, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > > We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
> > > > scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code,
- Original Message -
> Dne 23.9.2014 v 19:55 Kay Sievers napsal(a):
> > - Original Message -
> >>> We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
> >>> scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code, we only
> >&
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 05:03 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>>> Simple as: Don't add new features to systemd/udev, only fix bugs.
>
> The by-path has been part of udev for a long time, the users of this
> feature are from the
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> I haven't noticed a single one technical reason why the by-path should be
> moved out
> from udev and not fixed there when it's needed and most importantly how that
> move
> would help the users of this feature.
Because it was changed severa
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
> I am debugging a problem where the symlinks in /dev/disk/by-path
> disappeared for iSCSI target devices.
>
> It looks like it's from systemd/udev commit
> e98bbfd2074e2b1079b7059341eac25741baf319
>
> udev: path_id - suppress ID_PATH for devices
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 11.09.14 10:49, Alexander Larsson (al...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi, I'm looking at creating a runtime/app thing for Gnome in the style
>> of:
>> http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
>>
>> Ho
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 17.10.14 15:10, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>
> Looks generally OK (as discussed in Düsseldorf). I'll leave this for
> Kay to merge though, as udev is more his thing. Kay!
Sounds all fine, I would prefer though t
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On lör, 2014-10-25 at 13:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > Kay, any ideas on the udev database stability?
>>
>> No stability. And so far no guarantees that things will not change.
>>
>> The versions
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 27.10.14 14:43, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
>> > On lör, 2014-10-25 at 13:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> >> > Kay, any
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Minchev, Todor
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 14:20 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > 10.11.2014 14:10, Minchev, Todor wrote:
> > > Hello guys,
> > >
> > > I have been working on adding trusted boot (tboot) support to gummiboot
> > > and since this require
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> while debugging a curious build failure of umockdev on our ARM
> machines [1] I noticed a weird behaviour of udevadm wrt. debug logging
> [2].
>
> This patch fixes this (details are in the commit log). Kay, OK to
> push?
No, al
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 07:09:34PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>
>> On 12/18/2014 06:44 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> >
>> >On 12/18/2014 06:36 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> >>You missed the part w
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 12/16/2014 11:18 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 04:10:44PM -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:31:44AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> [ .. ]
So during bootup it's anyone's guess
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2)
> wrote:
>> Some numbers to the above mentioned arguments:
>> - in an idle system, systemd-udev-trigger.service takes by about 150-200ms
>> just to get the complete device tree to s
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:44 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
> The error path in efivar_get free's what would have been
> the copy of the string if the strcpy had succeeded, which
> it did not (or we wouldn't be in the error path).
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
s
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> I went to use libabc as the basis for a new library, and found a few issues;
> rather than just correcting them in my own library, I'd like to push the
> changes back into libabc.
>
> Josh Triplett (5):
> Makefile.am: Don't add abc subdirec
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Peeters Simon wrote:
>>> Where is it defined on arm? There is an include in kdbus.h.
>>
>> the problem is that it is "#ifndef __KERNEL__" and I assume that
>> __KERNEL__ gets defined when building the module.
>
> both patches attached (sory, didn't bother to try a
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
> It was <2014-02-21 pią 16:22>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Fri, 21.02.14 15:54, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Fix problems with unresolved symbols when building on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64.
>>>
>>> --8<-
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Armin K wrote:
> ---
> Makefile.am | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index e25d532..b1f0670 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -4479,11 +4479,13 @@ lib_LTLIBRARIES += \
> # move lib from $(libd
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Armin K wrote:
> Packages are still looking for the old pkg-config files,
> so until everything has been ported over, install them
> always, no matter if compat-libs are built or not.
So far, we think that compat should stay compat, and not mix with the
non-compat
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/22/2014 05:44 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Armin K wrote:
>>> ---
>>> Makefile.am | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Makef
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> Ok, I'll try my luck with git send-email then. I was unaware of this
> gmail-oddity. Sorry about that.
>
> Any ideas, why lubudev consideres so many things as attributes ?
What do you mean with attributes? Attributes are just the files in
/
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> For gudev -> gudevdevice:
> - Add support for get_sysfs_attr_keys()
> - Add support for has_sysfs_attr()
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
ht
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> This is broken again...
>
> In file included from ./src/core/unit.h:40:0,
> from src/shared/condition-util.c:35:
> ./src/core/execute.h:37:21: fatal error: seccomp.h: No such file or
> directory
> #include
>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 20.02.14 19:31, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote:
>> So right now we're considering something like this [2] or [3]. A bit of a
>> bummer to patch the build system like this, but we don't want to rely on
>> IFUNC, and t
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
> Needed only libudev-install-hook, not more.
It does not matter for proper filesystem layouts where everything is
in one location, in /usr. The split of / vs. /usr never made much
sense, it's a very incomplete and broken model.
For legacy
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Justin Brown wrote:
> I've been reading over some of the articles about KDBus and have a
> question about reclaiming memfds. Let's say that I have a process
> which is sending out a large amount of data over lots of signals, and
> there are more than one potential
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Monday 2014-02-24 23:08, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>
>>CHANGES WITH 210:
>>
>>* logind is now a lot more aggressive when suspending the
>> machine due to a closed laptop lid. Instead of acting only
>> on the lid
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Justin Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Justin Brown
>> wrote:
>>> I've been reading over some of the articles about KDBus and have a
>>> question abo
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Simon McVittie
wrote:
> On 25/02/14 17:30, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> There is not real difference, everything is just a message, being a
>> signal or a method. Only signals are limited to pure copied data,
>> disallowing fds; therefore signals wil
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Justin Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 25.02.14 10:41, Justin Brown (justin.br...@fandingo.org) wrote:
>>
>> And broadcast signals should never be large datagrams, but
>> only very short.
>
> Could you elabor
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 03:05 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:54:34PM +0100, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
>>> The todo says: "something pulls in pcre as shared object dependency into
>>> our daemons such as hostnam
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Mike wrote:
> My biggest dilemma at this time right now is with the RTC. The BeagleBone
> Black does have a RTC and it gets assigned to /dev/rtc0. There is however
> now battery backup for this device.
Assuming you meant "no"?
> I've added a DS1307 with a batte
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> + " --transform=rpm Create files list suitable for
> RPM %%files section\n"
Hmm, can't we maybe come up with something that isn't specific to rpm
or dpkg, something that is easily parsed but not bound to
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld wrote:
> First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose IPC
> layer; so that developers working on client-/server software will no longer
> need to create their own homemade IPC by using primitives like sockets or
> sim
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld
> wrote:
>> First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose
>> IPC
>> layer; so that developers working on client-/server softw
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld
>> wrote:
>>> First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose
>>> IPC
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> On 03/07/2014 07:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Since yesterday systemd in git can now discover root, /home, /srv and
>> swap partitions automatically based on GPT type GUIDs, thus making
>> /etc/fstab unnecessary for simple setup
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Lukas Nykryn wrote:
> ---
> src/udev/udev-event.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 11.03.14 18:14, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
>> Since we now use ln -s --relative, using this sed statement is redundant
>> and causes broken symlinks to be installed.
>
> Hmm, wouldn't it be nicer to just drop the
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Joseph Salisbury
wrote:
> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu[0]. We performed a kernel
> bisect, and found that a change introduced by upstream linux kernel
> commit 786235eeb introduced the bug as of v3.13-rc1.
>
> The bug indicates an issue with the SA
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Thanks, Zbyszek.
>
>> --prefix etc.
>
> I assume you mean:
> --prefix /etc
> and not
> prefix /etc
>
> is it so ?
No.
Just check out git and run ./autogen.sh, it will tell you what to do.
Kay
___
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> While trying to use the discovereable partitions stuff I ran into the
> following:
>
> Running systemd-efi-boot-generator on my machine results in:
> "Failed to read ESP partition UUID: Input/output error"
> The cause for this is that, th
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>> > While trying to use the discovereable partitions stuff I ran into the
>> > f
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:04:24PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>>> On Fri, M
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> systemd does not need or use CONFIG_EFI_VARS anywhere, this should
> be CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS instead.
> ---
> README | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:58:21AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> > /* link into parent domain */
>> > if (parent) {
>>
>> What if 'parent' was already unrefed at this point? That can happen any
>> time as soon we give up the lock.
>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 03/21/2014 12:35 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>> I've two questions:
>>
>> 1) Can we improve it in ordre to reduce the lock hold time ?
>
> We don't consider that a very frequent operation, so we never thought
> about optimizing this code path.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> >> Also it seems that now there is only support for one level of nested
>> >>
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni
> ---
> endpoint.c | 5 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni
> ---
> test/test-kdbus.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni
> ---
> handle.c | 8 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied.
Thanks,
Kay
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedeskt
gered.
* systemd-networkd will now assign predictable IPv4LL
addresses to its local interfaces.
Contributions from: Brandon Philips, Daniel Buch, Daniel Mack,
Dave Reisner, David Herrmann, Gerd Hoffmann, Greg
Kroah-Hartman, Hendrik Brueckner, Jason St. John,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Stephan Raue wrote:
> systemd-212 breaks if we run autoreconf before configuring and building
> with:
>
> autoreconf: running:
> /home/stephan/projects/openelec-master/build.OpenELEC-Generic.x86_64-devel/toolchain/bin/automake
> --add-missing --copy --force-missing
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Stephan Raue wrote:
> Am 26.03.2014 02:16, schrieb Kay Sievers:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Stephan Raue
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> systemd-212 breaks if we run autoreconf before configuring and building
>>> wit
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 16.03.14 19:49, Samuli Suominen (ssuomi...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16/03/14 15:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:10:15AM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> >> Since -Wl,-fuse-ld=gold addit
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Stephan Raue
> wrote:
>> Am 26.03.2014 02:16, schrieb Kay Sievers:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Stephan Raue
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> sy
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Hristo Venev wrote:
> Predictable names and more consistent.
> ---
> src/core/manager.c | 48 +++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/manager.c b/src/core/manager.c
> -
201 - 300 of 1344 matches
Mail list logo
