metals markets since 1985" would
they?
malmo
-Original Message-
From: Richard McCann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:13 PM
To: malmo
Cc: T&FMail List
Subject: RE: RE: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
At 09:28 PM 10/9/2003 -0400, malmo wrote..
>P
At 09:28 PM 10/9/2003 -0400, malmo wrote..
Post-modernism at its finest, but sorry, your original post only spoke
of a time-frame "...since 1985" And the improvement since 1985 went like
this:
And I would argue that you are confusing "bursts" of record activity, which
are extremely common over his
pert opinion on this matter
RMc
At 04:34 PM 10/10/2003 +, alan tobin wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
The problem with steroids is that they carry a hefty federal penalty and
that they have been the most tested for and a
bin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
>Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:40:57 -0700
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from mc11-f35.hotmail.com ([65.54.167.42]) by mc11-s6.hotmail.com
>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Th
OTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:40:57 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mc11-f35.hotmail.com ([65.54.167.42]) by mc11-s6.hotmail.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:03:30 -0700
Re
essing EPO.
Alan
From: "P.F.Talbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "P.F.Talbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "\"Athletics\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:06:35 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.
>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:09:55 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mc11-f13.hotmail.com ([65.54.167.20]) by mc11-s8.hotmail.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 23:29:25 -070
But, I guess that proves something. If a guy will give his left and right ones for
$2500, surely
he'll dope up for $60,000.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alan Tobin wrote:
>
> >That is pretty freaked up Malmo. I would give my left and right nut to get
>
> >$2500 for the male equivalent 2:37 maratho
13:08.4 8.2 0.683
>198712:58.4 10.01.112
>199812:39.4 19.01.730
>
>1
>194429:35.4
>195628:30.4 65.05.417
>196527:39.4 39.47.880
>197827:22.5 16.91.300
>198927:08.2 14.3 1.297
>1994 26:52.2 16
AM 11:21:59 CDT
> > To: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > CC: "'T&FMail List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
> >
> > My point is that since 1985, the men's records have continued to
&
calc
-Original Message-
From: Richard McCann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'T&FMail List'
Subject: Re: RE: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
I disagree. The trend analysis shown below refutes your point. We s
Well, as long as he's not using them
:-)
(Sorry, it was too easy)
Alan Tobin wrote:
That is pretty freaked up Malmo. I would give my left and right nut to get
$2500 for the male equivalent 2:37 marathon.
Thanks for sharing, Alan.
Phil
--
Lee Nichols
Assistant News Editor
The Austin Ch
Alan Tobin wrote:
>That is pretty freaked up Malmo. I would give my left and right nut to get
>$2500 for the male equivalent 2:37 marathon.
Thanks for sharing, Alan.
Phil
91F0:01C38E87]
Any woman who comes within 33 minutes of the world record gets a bonus
check of $2500 at Chicago. Now that's insane!
malmo
>
> From: "alan tobin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/10/09 Thu AM 11:15:35 CDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PRO
ann
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:41 AM
To: alan tobin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
The stagnation of men's throwing marks since the mid 1980s runs counter to
that argument. That's why I included them in the discussion. The men's
sh
o
>
> From: Richard McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/10/09 Thu AM 11:21:59 CDT
> To: "malmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: "'T&FMail List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
>
> My point is t
From: Richard McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Richard McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: (T&FMail List) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003
13:45:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mc12-f17.hotmail.com ([65.54.167.153])
sformation of Jeff
Galloway is just quite insane. Maybe I should become a triathlete.
Alan
From: Richard McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Richard McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: (T&FMail List) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll Date: Wed, 08 Oct
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard McCann
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 4:46 PM
To: T&FMail List
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
What's equally striking is that the
men's distance marks have improved dramatically since 1985 (and this is
true across all con
4:46 PM
To: T&FMail List
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
What's equally striking is that the
men's distance marks have improved dramatically since 1985 (and this is
true across all continents), while except for the Chinese outburst,
women
are only now surpassing the
At 05:22 PM 10/7/2003 -0700, t-and-f-digest wrote:
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: t-and-f: The Study was a 1995 poll
From:
http://www.bishops.ntc.nf.ca/TeenIssues/C.%20Little/PED.htm
PED Use in Professional Sports
I will point
From:
http://www.bishops.ntc.nf.ca/TeenIssues/C.%20Little/PED.htm
PED Use in Professional Sports
The very foundation upon which the sports community
rests is based on rules which intact fair play among
all competitors. These rules are not bent for anyone,
so why do some people see it fit to use P
22 matches
Mail list logo
