RE: t-and-f: Best all-time milers by state ?

2001-11-19 Thread Mcewen, Brian T
Georgia: For HS miles it could be Brendan Mahoney ('99) or Ralph King. For fastest post-HS times, it has to be Ralph King. Easy enough to figure these out though. Hoffman's site has all the elite Mile and 2-Mile times for HS'ers. /Brian McEwen -Original Message- From: toby -

RE: RE: t-and-f: Best all-time milers by state ?

2001-11-19 Thread Mcewen, Brian T
Look in the TaFNews book How They Train: Long Distances circa 1981. It has a profile of Wysocki in it. I believe he ran 4:00.xx, and a slightly superior time for 1500m. His PRs (through 1981) are in there though. /Brian McEwen -Original Message- From: Chapman, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL

t-and-f: Of several things

2001-11-19 Thread Ed Grant
Netters: NJ , of course, has no trouble identifying its fastest miler---who is already on the list---but the various posts raised a couple of questions: 1) Is a runner to be assigned to the state of residence or the state where he went to HS---Adam Dixon, for example, went

t-and-f: NCAA results

2001-11-19 Thread Ed Grant
Netters: This is stsrictly unofficial, but my word is that Colorado edged Stanford by one point. If so, the key to the Colorado win was a 26th place finish (4th man on the team) by Steve Slattery, who was described to me as not looking good at all at the 2M mark. His finish compares to

t-and-f: NCAA XC

2001-11-19 Thread Andrew Fitzhugh
From fansonly.com, Notre Dame specific story. Colorado over Stanford 90 to 91, what a team competition. -- Andy Nov. 19, 2001 Greenville, S.C. - The Notre Dame men's cross country team unofficially placed fifth at the NCAA Cross Country Championships today in Greenville, S.C. Unofficially,

t-and-f: NCAA results

2001-11-19 Thread Dave Cameron
The results are now on www.ncaachampionships.com = Dave Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com

t-and-f: NCAA results

2001-11-19 Thread Martin J. Dixon
are now up. http://www.furmanpaladins.com/track/championship/ncaaresultsindex.html Regards, Martin

Re: t-and-f: NCAA XC

2001-11-19 Thread Eric Hruschka
Colorado Crowned Men's Champion, BYU Wins Women's Title 2001 NCAA Division I Men's Championships Place: Furman University Date: November 19, 2001 Pla Num Name Team Time Adj 1 318 BOAZ CHBOIYWO EAST. MICHIGAN

t-and-f: NCAA XC

2001-11-19 Thread Jack Pfeifer
Highlights MEN 1. Colorado 90 (1-3-13-26-47) 2. Stanford 91 (6-11-18-19-37) 3. Arkansas 119 (2-12-17-29-58) N Arizona, Wisconsin, Notre Dame, Portland, Villanova, NC State, Providence... 1. Boaz Cheboiywo (E Michigan) 2. J. Torres (Colo) 3. Cragg (Ark) 4. Ritzenhein (Colo) 5. Watson (ND), 6. Shay

RE: t-and-f: Of several things

2001-11-19 Thread malmo
Why sexism? Looks as though Mr Hoffman compiled a list that is sex-blind. malmo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Grant Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:06 PM To: track net Subject: t-and-f: Of several things Netters: NJ ,

Fwd: t-and-f: new 5000m world record coming next week

2001-11-19 Thread Richard McCann
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:09:22 -0500 From: Post, Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: t-and-f: new 5000m world record coming next week The track and field competition at the Chinese Natl. Games begins Saturday and ends the 23rd at Guangzhou. Ah, time for the quadrennial Fictional Track Games!!!

t-and-f: All-American cutoff

2001-11-19 Thread Ed Grant
Netters: Does anyone know what the cutiff number in each race is for All-American status? Ed Grant

t-and-f: NCAA pictures

2001-11-19 Thread tom murrell
Several pictures I took today can be found by clicking on the NCAA link at www.btcs.org/ths/track sorry there are not captioned or in order as I am rushing to pack for Thanksgiving break. Not mentioned so far is that Flanagan of UNC had the lead at the botto of the last BIG hill, about 1000m

t-and-f: kimani

2001-11-19 Thread John N. Friedman
What happened to Kimani?

Re: t-and-f: new 5000m world record coming next week

2001-11-19 Thread Martin J. Dixon
Maybe, maybe not. See the 1. http://www.tilastopaja.net/ng2001/index.html Regards, Martin - Original Message - From: Richard McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TFMail List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:29 PM Subject: Fwd: t-and-f: new 5000m world record coming

Re: t-and-f: new 5000m world record coming next week

2001-11-19 Thread Michael Contopoulos
With the Chinese Federation cracking down on the drug cheats within their own ranks in an attempt to be seen in a favorable light by the rest of the world (aka, Beijing 2008), I doubt we will see any World Records. Mike From: Martin J. Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Martin J. Dixon [EMAIL

RE: t-and-f: kimani

2001-11-19 Thread Ben Hall
he's been hurt. pulled off the course fairly early. believe it was achilles problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John N. Friedman Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: t-and-f: kimani What

Re: t-and-f: kimani

2001-11-19 Thread Keenan Robbins
dropped around 2-3K John N. Friedman wrote: What happened to Kimani?

t-and-f: NCAA XC QUESTION

2001-11-19 Thread Mike Fanelli
When was the last time that a mere point separated the team title?? Mike Fanelli your San Francisco Bay Area real estate resource Pacific Union Real Estate Group Ltd. (415) 447 - 6254 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.SFabode.com www.MarinHouseHunting.com

t-and-f: My Friend's Marathon ( Taper)

2001-11-19 Thread Michael Contopoulos
Well, My friend ran the Phili Marathon this weekend. He did that pretty radical taper I mentioned to all of you... and I think it worked for him. He finished in 2:36:41 for 15th place. Not bad for this 23 year old's (as of Sep) debut 'thon off 80 mile weeks. After going out in 1:14 he died

Re: t-and-f: Indoor/Outdoor Records

2001-11-19 Thread Roger Ruth
On November 17, or thereabouts, in response to my post that noted three errors in his previous post on this topic, The Ed wrote, Geez, Rog, I hate to keep beating on you, but that (i.e., the interpretation that under previous rules an Indoor World Record could not also be ratified as a World