. But it
certainly wasn't dead.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Ruth
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: M50 discus mystery solved: Brisbane messed up
Randy wrote,
DON'T TRY TO MAKE
In a message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2001 1:16:54 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings, all
Jacey Octigan of the Brisbane WAVA meet has informed us that the original results
of the M50 discus -- as listed by National Masters News showing the Brits in first
and fourth
For most people on this list, the list itself is the only
route to resolve apparent anomalies and discrepancies.
Anybody who relies on information by using a search
engine to scout an open e-mail distribution list,
certainly does so at their own risk.
Not everybody has the same resources to
In a message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2001 3:47:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DON'T TRY TO MAKE THIS LIST INTO SOMETHING IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE!!!
i would posit that this list is well down the road to becoming something nobody either
intends it to be or wants it to
Randy wrote,
DON'T TRY TO MAKE THIS LIST INTO SOMETHING IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE!!!
and Garry responded,
i would posit that this list is well down the road to becoming something
nobody either intends it to be or wants it to be---DEAD
and i would posit that no end of people have become
Greetings, all
Jacey Octigan of the Brisbane WAVA meet has informed us that the original
results of the M50 discus -- as listed by National Masters News showing the
Brits in first and fourth -- are correct and that a subsequent posting on
the official Brisbane Web site is incorrect. In other
