Ok, oops, didn't get to broadcast about it.
...
but anyway... "Greenways" are (technically) downright confusing to map.
The surfaces dont match, nor to the uses match.. the only thing that is
common is the name. and that there are signs all over the place for it.
In Winnipeg here's an example
htt
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Anthony wrote:
>>>
>>> What does "no bicycles" mean? Can you show a picture of a sign which
>>> means you aren't allowed to carry a bicycle through this area?
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Anthony wrote:
>>
>> What does "no bicycles" mean? Can you show a picture of a sign which
>> means you aren't allowed to carry a bicycle through this area?
>
> Perhaps, as James wondered, "a sign consisting of
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Anthony wrote:
>
> What does "no bicycles" mean? Can you show a picture of a sign which
> means you aren't allowed to carry a bicycle through this area?
Perhaps, as James wondered, "a sign consisting of a crossed red circle
with a bike in it"? Anyone know what th
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:31 PM, James Livingston wrote:
> So, tagging list, how are you supposed to tag "cyclists must dismount",
bicycle=no
> tag "no bicycles"
bicycle=no
> and what does bicycle=no mean?
bicycle=no means you're not allowed to ride a bicycle.
What does "no bicycles" mean? C
James Livingston wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Because we were having *so* much fun repeating the footway-cycleway-path
> debate again, here's another related question: what does bicycle=no actually
> mean, no bicycles or no cycling?
>
> Last night I asked on IRC whether anyone know how to tag a "Cyclist
Here in Brazil it's the same. It's not allowed to cycle on footpaths, you
must dismount and walk. But in most cases, as the footpaths are implicit on
the streets, a bycicle=no tag would mean that it is not allowed to cycle on
the street itself, such as a bridge or a long tunnel.
Cheers,
2009/12/2
2009/12/3 James Livingston :
> * In France, if you are walking your bike you're considered a pedestrian. So
> it's a footpath
Same thing applies in a number of Australian states, you are supposed
to dismount and walk your bike across pedestrian crossings.
Hi all,
Because we were having *so* much fun repeating the footway-cycleway-path debate
again, here's another related question: what does bicycle=no actually mean, no
bicycles or no cycling?
Last night I asked on IRC whether anyone know how to tag a "Cyclists must
dismount" sign, and would bic
2009/12/2 Steve Bennett
> so i prefer *not* using causeway, because it has two distinct meanings
>> whereas embankment only has one
>>
>
> Yes...but embankment != causeway. (A causeway is an embankment with a
> road...)
>
OK, if it's like this, then the tagging is clear (and it is as it has been
10 matches
Mail list logo
