Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread Mike Harris
+1 for UK too. Mike Harris -Original Message- From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of John Smith Sent: 02 December 2009 21:47 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no 2009/12/3

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread Mike Harris
IMHO it would be more useful if bicycle=no meant 'no cycling' ... I think there are quite a few situations where a cyclist could wheel (or carry) the bike but not ride it. Without bicycle=no it would be difficult to know that it was 'no cycling' but with 'bicycle=no' + 'foot=yes' it would be

Re: [Tagging] Non-parking car lots

2009-12-03 Thread Elena of Valhalla
On 12/3/09, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: And while I'm at it, how to tag carparks that are clearly not for public access? Staff carparks, carparks in government buildings... I've tagged them as any other carpark, and then added access=private on both the carpark area and the service

Re: [Tagging] tagging Greenways (was: Re: [OSM-talk] Good routing vs legal routing (was: Path vsfootwayvs cycleway vs...))

2009-12-03 Thread Richard Mann
These short-distance signposted routes can be tagged as lcn (local cycle network) relations. I'd prefer there to be a distinction between these (which I think of as leisure/tourist routes and would call tcn) and utility routes into a town centre, but there isn't a distinction at the moment (and

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread Richard Mann
On public land you can usually push a bike and be treated as a pedestrian, but that's not always the case on private land (eg the University Parks in Oxford) - bicycles are banned altogether. So there is a distinction, but it can probably be achieved by using bicycle=no for situations where

Re: [Tagging] Non-parking car lots

2009-12-03 Thread Simone Saviolo
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote: Wouldn't those be simply commercial or industrial areas? I think there's no need to record what kind of product is stocked there, and cars (in that case) are just

[Tagging] More about parking

2009-12-03 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
Hi, Here in Denmark it is quite common that a street has parking slots that can be either perpendicular or at a 45 degree angle to the street. These slots can sometimes be on both sides of the street. They are marked with lines painted on the pavement. Any idea on how to tag these? (I can

Re: [Tagging] More about parking

2009-12-03 Thread Simone Saviolo
Hi, both kinds of street-side parking are also present all through Italy, and probably in Europe and in the rest of the world. There has been discussion about this in the wiki [1]. Personally, I haven't tagged any yet. I think it's safe to assume (at least in Italy) that the default is that you

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread Arlindo Pereira
Ok, but backing to the first point. It is clear that in most, if not all places bycicle=no means that you cannot ride, but you can push unmounted. How about places that you cannot have a bike at all (such as inside of a shopping mall for instance)? Cheers 2009/12/3 Pieren pier...@gmail.com On

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread Emilie Laffray
2009/12/3 Arlindo Pereira nig...@nighto.net Ok, but backing to the first point. It is clear that in most, if not all places bycicle=no means that you cannot ride, but you can push unmounted. How about places that you cannot have a bike at all (such as inside of a shopping mall for instance)?

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread Arlindo Pereira
Er.. I'm currently doing that here in Rio :D http://osm.org/go/OVc08DWYY-- Cheers 2009/12/3 Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com 2009/12/3 Arlindo Pereira nig...@nighto.net Ok, but backing to the first point. It is clear that in most, if not all places bycicle=no means that you cannot

Re: [Tagging] More about parking

2009-12-03 Thread Arlindo Pereira
I proposed a tag for tagging exactly this, but Cartinus was faster to paste the link ;) Be sure to check out the discussion page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/parking_lane Cheers 2009/12/3 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl

Re: [Tagging] Non-parking car lots

2009-12-03 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/12/3 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com Wouldn't those be simply commercial or industrial areas? I think there's no need to record what kind of product is stocked there, and cars (in that case) are just another kind of product. Yes, they would be an industrial area (not

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread Steve Bennett
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote: But I don't know a sensible name for a tag for it right now. carriage_prohibited? Steve ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread Cartinus
On Friday 04 December 2009 06:23:42 Steve Bennett wrote: On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote: But I don't know a sensible name for a tag for it right now. carriage_prohibited? Steve http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carriage They wouldn't fit on the escalators

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread Steve Bennett
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote: They wouldn't fit on the escalators anyway ;) As in, bicycle=carriage_prohibited. Maybe that's an australian use. Actually now that I google it, I guess carriage means, taking it on a train or something. All I can think of are

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

2009-12-03 Thread John Smith
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote: They wouldn't fit on the escalators anyway ;) As in, bicycle=carriage_prohibited. Maybe that's an australian use. Actually now that I google it, I guess carriage means, taking it

Re: [Tagging] Restaurant delivery, takeaway, and no seating

2009-12-03 Thread Steve Bennett
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Katie Filbert filbe...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a standard way of tagging restaurants or fast food places, as having: 1) no seating 2) delivery 3) takeaway For #1, I suggest seating=no(perhaps this tag could also be used with seating=outdoors, if the