More I read other people arguments, more I want to support shop=seafood.
I would say someone create proposal feature wiki page for it and we wote.
Cheers,
Peter.
2010/5/4 Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net:
So, we have some objection to shop=fishmonger, and more support for
shop=fish and
(note: removed talk-us)
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:39 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
... It's a big world out there and there is bound to be grey areas
that local knowledge will tags things one way or the other...
There is bound to be grey areas only if we continue to use these
On 4 May 2010 18:14, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
1) allow for the specification of more than one type simultaneously,
e.g. amenity=A;B, amenity=B;C, etc., or
2) change/specify in more detail the definitions of A, B and C so that
they *are* mutually exclusive, or
3) be forced to
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:22 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Do you have any concrete examples?
Most McDonald's restaurants have tables and sit down areas, but we
tag them as fast food because that is the politically correct way to
refer to junk food...
The discussions have
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
More I read other people arguments, more I want to support shop=seafood.
I would say someone create proposal feature wiki page for it and we wote.
Cheers,
Peter.
I would support either shop=seafood or shop=fish and
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 02:08:01PM +0100, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
In the UK a fish shop can be one of two,
three
usually mutually exclusive, things:
* A fishmonger, selling wet (i.e. raw) fish and seafood
* A Fish and Chip shop, selling cooked fast food
* A shop selling live fish,
On 5 May 2010 01:24, Stephen Gower socks-openstreetmap@earth.li wrote:
Those calling for shop=fish rather than shop=fishmonger - what would you use
for
the pet fish shop?
How many pet shops would there be that only sell fish?
I'm guessing a small minority at best, but this would be
On 5 May 2010 09:22, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
(Just to make life even hearder: is McCafe a cafe or fast food?)
Maybe it's all three at the same time...
Does it have a sit down and eat area restaurant
Is the food delievered in less than 5 minutes (usually)... fast_food
Is
At 2010-05-04 12:04, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net [2010-05-04 09:47 -0700]:
I generally regard fast_food as a place where you have to walk up to a
counter and order your food. Even if they do bring it out to your table
when ready, they will not generally come
On 5 May 2010 11:15, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Would you call dunkin donuts fast food? I do, because I get more of a
megacorp volume feel than a quality food feel there. I think most
I think you are being a tad bias, since small corner stores in
Australia sell fast food of lesser
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
On 5 May 2010 11:15, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Would you call dunkin donuts fast food? I do, because I get more of a
megacorp volume feel than a quality food feel there. I think most
I think you are being a tad bias, since small corner
On 5 May 2010 11:37, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
I'd actually prefer something like shop=donut to cafe, since it seems that
Isn't cafe a French word for coffee?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 5/4/10 9:51 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 5 May 2010 11:36, Greg Troxelg...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Fair enough. If you judge on food quality and is food presented faster
than it could reasonably be preparted then I think we're in closer
agreement.
My point was, we shouldn't base a
On 5 May 2010 11:58, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
perhaps we need
crap=yes
To be more effective, and less subjective, you will probably need
sub-tagging to define who it's crap too
crap:snobby_elite=yes
crap:student=no
crap:homeless=no
etc...
On 5/4/10 11:15 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 5 May 2010 12:51, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
crap:mega=yes
as well.
That doesn't make any sense...
lots and lots of crap: mega crap
___
Tagging mailing list
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:19 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2010 09:22, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
(Just to make life even hearder: is McCafe a cafe or fast food?)
Maybe it's all three at the same time...
Does it have a sit down and eat area
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything wrong with using:
amenity=cafe;fast_food;restaurant? If not, that approach, plus those
One problem would be the conversion of such a thing to GPS formats. I
guess you could stack three POIs in one place,
On 5 May 2010 14:26, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything wrong with using:
amenity=cafe;fast_food;restaurant? If not, that approach, plus those
It's rarely a good idea to jam tags together into a single key like
that, most applications have enough trouble with the
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
The entire reason such tagging is useful (vs. amenity=food) is that
people can ask find me a nearby cafe. When I ask that, I want a
coffee shop that serves sandwiches, or a sandwich shop that serves
coffee, or something like
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:32 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be better to tag the primary function of a business, and add
modifiers...
So amenity=fast_food + cafe=yes would be roughly equivalent to
amenity=cafe + fast_food=yes? Interesting proposal. It seems like a
On 5 May 2010 14:39, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
So amenity=fast_food + cafe=yes would be roughly equivalent to
amenity=cafe + fast_food=yes? Interesting proposal. It seems like a
plausible workaround for indicating a plurality of amenity=* values
without resorting to a
At 2010-05-04 21:32, John Smith wrote:
...
amenity=fast_food
cafe=yes/no
seating/resturant=yes/no
drive_through=yes/no
I've been using motorcar=yes/no for drive-through, similar to access. This
did require tweaking of the rendering style in JOSM, which had this tag too
far up in position (and
22 matches
Mail list logo
