On 4 May 2010 18:14, Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) allow for the specification of more than one type simultaneously, > e.g. amenity=A;B, amenity=B;C, etc., or > 2) change/specify in more detail the definitions of A, B and C so that > they *are* mutually exclusive, or > 3) be forced to tag things incorrectly > > Which option shall it be? I vote 2, which includes the option of just > using amenity=D (where D=A OR B OR C)
Do you have any concrete examples? Most McDonald's "restaurants" have tables and sit down areas, but we tag them as fast food because that is the politically correct way to refer to junk food... _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
