Normally you should start a proposal. I think you can immediately start with
the voting stadium since there is not much to discuss about these tags.
There are just an extension to the current schema and are perfectly
backwards compatible.
If you created the proposal. Do send a mail to this list wi
Am 05.06.2011 14:31, schrieb Sander Deryckere:
> Normally you should start a proposal.
+1
> I think you can immediately start
> with the voting stadium since there is not much to discuss about these
> tags.
-1
> There are just an extension to the current schema and are
> perfectly backwards com
On 5 June 2011 23:58, fly wrote:
> As a proposal you can almost added it the same way on the wiki as a
> approved tag and you can change anything that might not work or find a
> better solution while testing.
I've done this in the past and set the status to defacto, rather than approved.
___
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 15:58 +0200, fly wrote:
> I wonder why many people try to force the approval of a tag by fast
> votes on the wiki. A tag gets approved by uses in the data and software
> handling it.
Which raises another point, that if you really want to get your proposal
accepted more rapidl
