[Tagging] Advice clarification of the railway tracks=* tag required.

2012-08-07 Thread Dave F.
Hi A user in GB has been editing railway lines by adding tracks=4 even though each individual track has been mapped: www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/174899570 From the railway page of the wiki: When modeling multi-track parallel railway lines in close proximity they can either be modeled

Re: [Tagging] Advice clarification of the railway tracks=* tag required.

2012-08-07 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2012-08-07 14:56, Dave F. wrote: Hi A user in GB has been editing railway lines by adding tracks=4 even though each individual track has been mapped: www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/174899570 From the railway page of the wiki: When modeling multi-track parallel railway lines in close

Re: [Tagging] Advice clarification of the railway tracks=* tag required.

2012-08-07 Thread Richard Mann
I guess that'll be me. The total number of tracks is a useful piece of data, whereas tracks=1 on the four individual tracks is useless. I don't really mind where the information is stored; the tracks tag looked like a sensible place to me (and indeed was already being used in this way in some

Re: [Tagging] Advice clarification of the railway tracks=* tag required.

2012-08-07 Thread Richard Mann
Tracks is actually mostly used in the UK to tag the total number of tracks, whether the lines have been individually mapped or not (this snapshot is a few days old): http://www.itoworld.com/map/14#lat=51.78185298480979lon=-0.5093040346167376zoom=7 ___

Re: [Tagging] Advice clarification of the railway tracks=* tag required.

2012-08-07 Thread Dave F.
On 08/08/2012 00:05, Richard Mann wrote: ...whether the lines have been individually mapped or not: You're incorrect to think this. As I've said before it's used to clarify how many tracks each way represents.

Re: [Tagging] Advice clarification of the railway tracks=* tag required.

2012-08-07 Thread André Pirard
On 2012-08-07 23:56,  Dave F. wrote : Hi A user in GB has been editing railway lines by adding tracks=4 even though each individual track has been mapped: www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/174899570 From the