[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - toilets, toilets:disposal, pitlatrine, cleanup

2013-07-07 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
As issues seem relatively resolved, I'm opening for vote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets Thank you to all who helped craft the details on the proposal through comments. My primary goal here, by the way, is to get mapping of types into good enough shape,

Re: [Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

2013-07-07 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 07.07.2013 18:59, John Sturdy wrote: > On further thought, I'd go for type=deciduous, rather than > broad-lea[fv]ed. Not quite the same thing (I think larches are > deciduous but not broad-leaved) but I think it's the normal "technical" > term (the others being "evergreen"). That would make th

Re: [Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

2013-07-07 Thread Murry McEntire
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, John Sturdy wrote: > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, fly wrote: > >> Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly: >> > Hey >> > >> > Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for >> > broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a

Re: [Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

2013-07-07 Thread John Sturdy
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, fly wrote: > Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly: > > Hey > > > > Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for > > broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice > > task for a bot. > > Sorry, numbers are towards "leav

Re: [Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

2013-07-07 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 07.07.2013 18:47, fly wrote: > Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly: >> Hey >> >> Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for >> broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice >> task for a bot. > > Sorry, numbers are towards "leaved". Numbers are

Re: [Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

2013-07-07 Thread John Sturdy
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:33 PM, fly wrote: > Hey > > Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for > broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice > task for a bot. > I'm pretty sure it's "broad-leaved". The other sounds only slightly wrong to m

Re: [Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

2013-07-07 Thread fly
Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly: > Hey > > Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for > broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice > task for a bot. Sorry, numbers are towards "leaved". > On the other hand, I wonder if it is useful to use

[Tagging] type for natural=tree (leaved <-> leafed)

2013-07-07 Thread fly
Hey Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice task for a bot. On the other hand, I wonder if it is useful to use type=* and not tree_type=* or tree:type=* as type is the key for relations and it is