% is the value shown on signs, the highest I can remember seeing is 25%, will
be on the lookout now.
There may still be some older 1:4 (1 in 4) type signs around so maybe a unit is
useful.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 12/08/2013 22:13 André Pirard wrote:
On 2013-08-12
During my updates of some wiki translations, I discovered the map
featured tag office=it. When you asked yourself what means my
message title office=kjuilmn, then you feel like an average
contributor reading office=it for the first time.
Here is our wiki about it:
Il giorno 13/ago/2013, alle ore 14:28, Pieren pier...@gmail.com ha scritto:
means we should really avoid abbreviations in main tags (sub-tags can
be discussed).
That's why I would like to change the wiki to e.g.
office=information_technology and check (on talk list) if it can be
changed in
Hi,
A long discussion with multiple ideas given is currently taking place about
power poles and hosted features on the talk feed of the Substation
refinement proposal.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Substation_refinement#Transformer_type
As explained in
Hey Francois
+10 for deprecating power=tower/pole and tag them what they are: a tower
or a pole.
On 13.08.2013 16:31, François Lacombe wrote:
A long discussion with multiple ideas given is currently taking place
about power poles and hosted features on the talk feed of the Substation
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:31 PM, François Lacombe
Many tricks promote some extra tags like power=pole +
transformer=distribution (power=transformer is here implicit) but they sound
like tricks to me.
It's not unusual in OSM.
See shop=organicor shop=supermarket+organic=yes;
See amenity=bar or
Il giorno 13/ago/2013, alle ore 16:31, François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu ha scritto:
Another possibility would be to deprecate power=pole and power=tower and use
man_made=pole and man_made=tower+tower:type=power
It would allow us to have nodes with man_made=pole +
I would prefer that you didn't pretend we will deprecate a tag so widely used
just so a small proportion of them can have another power tag on it when we can
easily just add transformer=yes or something similar.
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno 13/ago/2013, alle ore
power=tower ... 4'667'869
power=pole . 1'144'985
Looks established. It makes no sense (and there is IMHO no need) to change
these.
/al
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
There is another frequently used value in the same category: office=ngo
Want to change that as well?
I am unsure how strict we should be in this no-abbrevation business
For me it seems OK as is.
On 13 August 2013 15:26, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno 13/ago/2013,
Thing is, abbreviations lost their meaning when in lower-case.
Yves
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
* Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at [2013-08-09 07:28 +0200]:
I also dislike the suggested special member roles: The positioning
of the label depends on the font size, the free space, the map
section and zoom level etc. and should therefore be determined by
the renderer.
I tend to think of
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
I tend to think of label nodes as hints for the renderer that provide it
with information it cannot derive on its own. The canonical example, I
think, is a town where it makes sense to place the label over the town
center,
13 matches
Mail list logo
