Re: [Tagging] Utility corridor mapping

2013-09-05 Thread Ronnie Soak
The proposed tagging scheme doesn't sound too bad to me. It's easily expandable for those who want to map more detail utilities:sewage=underground utilities:electricity=overhead utilities:communications=underground But I would vote for just mapping what is somewhat verifiable on the ground.

Re: [Tagging] Utility corridor mapping

2013-09-05 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
Most direct and least expandable is: overhead_cables=[yes/no] overhead_utilities=[yes/no] or utilities = power; fibre; sewage or [none] utilities:overhead = [yes/no] ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Utility corridor mapping

2013-09-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/9/5 Ronnie Soak chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com utilities:communications=underground instead of communications we could distinguish cable tv, fibre optic cables and copper cables (phone, DSL, ...) and maybe more. If there isn't any detail (read: knowledge by the mapper) it also seems

Re: [Tagging] Utility corridor mapping

2013-09-05 Thread Dave F.
On 04/09/2013 06:21, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: To see how it feels, I've started to tag my local area with: utilities=underground Personally I don't think underground services should be mapped in the OSM database. Id you can't view it, it shouldn't be a primary tag. Such data can be

[Tagging] School and training

2013-09-05 Thread Fernando Trebien
Hello everyone, Here in Brazil we have started discussing special cases for tagging (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Refer%C3%AAncia#Casos_espec.C3.ADficos). There are two common cases that don't seem to be covered by OSM yet: language schools and cram schools. I found

Re: [Tagging] School and training

2013-09-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/9/5 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com Hello everyone, Here in Brazil we have started discussing special cases for tagging ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Refer%C3%AAncia#Casos_espec.C3.ADficos ). There are two common cases that don't seem to be

Re: [Tagging] School and training

2013-09-05 Thread Fernando Trebien
Well, using amenity=school would have the advantage of immediate support by current renderers and applications and no need for new tags. While being tagging for the application, it doesn't sounds so incorrect to me (but I must admit it may be due to the language barrier). Would it be wrong to

Re: [Tagging] funny tags: turning_radius

2013-09-05 Thread André Pirard
On 2013-09-04 15:50, Ronnie Soak wrote : 2013/8/30 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org mailto:frede...@remote.org Hi, On 29.08.2013 16:07, André Pirard wrote: This tag was created for the specific needs of logging [to tell which timbering vehicle can pass a bend] More