Re: [Tagging] How to tag an imaginary oneway barrier

2014-02-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-02-01 Pee Wee piewi...@gmail.com: 1 seems the best representation, But rather complicated I'm afraid You need turn restrictions very often anyway to represent legal restrictions, and this is just another case. You'd split the way at the node, add both ways as members (from and to role)

Re: [Tagging] How to tag an imaginary oneway barrier

2014-02-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-02-01 Ilpo Järvinen ilpo.jarvi...@helsinki.fi: Are there some real world examples where a maxspeed for opposing direction is really different? (Signage bugs don't count or short sections that occur due to sign placement). there are, beside these, signage bugs do not exist from a legal

Re: [Tagging] How to tag an imaginary oneway barrier

2014-02-02 Thread Tomasz Rojek
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote: The 4th option is to use turn restrictions on the crossing where the 'virtual' sign is placed. I think that in most cases this is better than 1st option. It depends how far from the junction the sign is placed. When it's just at the

Re: [Tagging] How to tag an imaginary oneway barrier

2014-02-02 Thread Richard Mann
We have lots of false one-way streets in Oxford. We tag a short section with oneway=yes+oneway:bicycle=no. Richard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] How to tag an imaginary oneway barrier

2014-02-02 Thread André Pirard
On 2014-02-02 08:56, Colin Smale wrote : On 2014-02-02 02:15, André Pirard wrote: On 2014-02-01 17:39, Colin Smale wrote : On 2014-02-01 17:30, Masi Master wrote: Normally traffic signs belongs to the road to the next intersection/crossing. That depends on the country - different

Re: [Tagging] How to tag an imaginary oneway barrier

2014-02-02 Thread Pee Wee
2014-02-02 Jo winfi...@gmail.com: The 4th option is to use turn restrictions on the crossing where the 'virtual' sign is placed. Jo That may very wel be the best solution. That means we have to split the way at the location of the traffic_sign. That is kind of a shame because I was

Re: [Tagging] TMC proposal - RFC

2014-02-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-02-01 Manuel Hohmann mhohm...@physnet.uni-hamburg.de: This proposal is in fact a collection of several independent proposals. Each proposal should thus be treated separately. The first stage of the proposal can be found here:

Re: [Tagging] TMC proposal - RFC

2014-02-02 Thread Manuel Hohmann
FWIW, there is also this proposal (currently only in German): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Proposed_features/New_TMC_scheme Thanks, I forgot to mention this one. I think I should put a link on my proposal page and briefly explain what are the differences and why. Best, Manuel

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bag shop, pet shop

2014-02-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-02-01 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl: That's a good point. How would you distinguish between a bag shop and a leather shop? I'd use bag shop if they only or mostly sold bags and leather shop if other items like belts, gloves, purses were sold as well. cheers, Martin