2014-02-02 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com>: > The 4th option is to use turn restrictions on the crossing where the > 'virtual' sign is placed. > > Jo >
That may very wel be the best solution. That means we have to split the way at the location of the traffic_sign. That is kind of a shame because I was thinking of also adding a "traffic_sign:backward:NL:C6" on the node of the split. The traffic sign WIKI<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Traffic_sign#As_part_of_a_way>says this about placing traffic_sign tags on a node that is part of a way : "It is important to note that the affected direction can only be unambiguously specified by using nodes which are part of *exactly one* highway <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway>=*. Avoid junction nodes and nodes between two ways as well (where they have been split, but are connected by a node). If in doubt, better simply insert a new node into the way instead of using an existing one. " I guess that the best place for the traffic_sign tag is then just a bit away from the split node.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
