I always thought the meaning of noexit=yes was very clear. Obviously there
is some confusion I was not aware of. If a highway ends with no way to
continue, the final node is tagged with noexit=yes. I only use it if I am
sure there is no way forward from the end of the particular way. As someone
who
On 2014-04-04 17:35, Pieren wrote :
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly wrote:
>>> If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a
>>> for validator checks in JOSM, as we have more than 100,000 ways with
>
OK, I didn't check. Maybe I consulted the wiki at the wrong point in time
and got it wrong for the past 6 years.
Polyglot
2014-04-04 17:53 GMT+02:00 fly :
> On 03.12.2013 17:08, Jo wrote:
> > Or possibly somebody changed the meaning of the tag on the wiki, without
> > telling dinosaurs like myse
I was thinking the same thing, but couldn't put it into words properly. If
40% of noexit tags are on ways, this is meaningful, not some sort of
accident. FWIW I also prefer to put the tag on the way, I don't care about
the gratification that it gets rendered with a nifty icon in JOSM when put
on a
On 03.12.2013 17:08, Jo wrote:
> Or possibly somebody changed the meaning of the tag on the wiki, without
> telling dinosaurs like myself. At first it was a tag that went on ways
> which are a dead end for cars.
The wiki history tells a different story.
> It got an icon in JOSM when put on nodes
On 04.04.2014 17:35, Pieren wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly wrote:
>
>>> If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a
>>> for validator checks in JOSM, as we have more than 100,000 ways with
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly wrote:
>> If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a
>> for validator checks in JOSM, as we have more than 100,000 ways with
>> this tag.
> Basically I agree with the cu
>
> I also can't see why, but people also use noexit=no
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/noexit#values
>
noexit=no is the same as fixme=continue
I believe fixme=continue should be favored since it actually appears in QA
Tools and in JOSM
2014-04-04 11:56 GMT-03:00 André Pirard :
> On 20
On 2014-04-04 16:14, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote :
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly wrote:
>> On 03.04.2014 21:22, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:17 PM, fly wrote:
Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
>>> The way has one side that has/is an exit :-)
>>> Tagging the
Hi,
Following a long dated thread, dormant draft here, what is said in the
wiki article and now clarified...
We now agree, Georg.
It seems that this tag is one of the most understood one, and I have
modified the wiki with a warning ahead so that the reader read more that
the first phrase and a ch
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly wrote:
> On 03.04.2014 21:22, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:17 PM, fly wrote:
>>> Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
>>
>> The way has one side that has/is an exit :-)
>> Tagging the whole way as "noexit=yes" seems strange.
>
> If it is
2014-04-04 14:27 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> what about the tag "sells"? It is not used very often right now:
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/sells
> but could be a universal way to indicate selling particularities
>
+1
I like sells=* more than baby_goods=*. That way a shop=spor
On 03.04.2014 21:22, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:17 PM, fly wrote:
>> Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
>
> The way has one side that has/is an exit :-)
> Tagging the whole way as "noexit=yes" seems strange.
If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna
Richard Welty wrote:
and if you are not sure about the extent of the structure or its nature
there's no harm in nipping out a short section, setting layer=1 and
skipping the other tagging (bridge=yes or whatever.) you have
accurately represented what you know and maintained correct
topology.
.
On 4/4/14 5:51 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> Stop saying GPS. Forget even about aerial imagery. When I had no aerial
> imagery in my area, I either did not draw such features (leaving them for
> future improvements), or approximate. "The road there is about 6 meters
> wide, so I'll draw two nodes abo
2014-04-04 12:05 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen :
> Personally I would use shop=baby_goods, baby_goods=strollers. That way you
> preserve full detail, and you also accomodate data consumers that don't
> know about stroller shops.
what about the tag "sells"? It is not used very often right now:
ht
I never heard the term pushchair in any American context. In fact, this is
the first time I've ever seen it. We use stroller, or if you're old enough,
walker, when we talk about conveyances for small babies. Nowadays walkers
are those wheeled frames that help older or disabled folks get around but
On Apr 4, 2014 11:44 AM, "SomeoneElse" wrote:
>
> André Riedel wrote:
>>
>> At the moment "stroller" is used for ramps or ways as access condition.
>>
>
> But it's ambiguous, even in American. It's a noun meaning "pushchair"
only in American; in both English AND American it means "a person going
Hi,
Almost same discussion when I try to define baby care tagging. :)
(sorry for my inactive status.)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/babycare
Baby care tagging is still under RFC, so I'll change my proposal as the
result of this discussion.
BTW, +1 to subtag scheme f
And it appears John Lewis department stores sell strollers:
http://www.johnlewis.com/search/strollers
Steve
On 04/04/2014 11:36, André Riedel wrote:
At the moment "stroller" is used for ramps or ways as access condition.
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=stroller
2014-04-04 12:25 GMT
André Riedel wrote:
At the moment "stroller" is used for ramps or ways as access condition.
But it's ambiguous, even in American. It's a noun meaning "pushchair"
only in American; in both English AND American it means "a person going
for a walk". I can't comment on other English variants (
At the moment "stroller" is used for ramps or ways as access condition.
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=stroller
2014-04-04 12:25 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes :
> Strollers are, I think, called pushchairs in English.
>
>
> shop=baby_goods
>
> baby_goods=push_chairs
>
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
>
>
Strollers are, I think, called pushchairs in English.
shop=baby_goods
baby_goods=push_chairs
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 04/04/2014 11:05 Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Personally I would use shop=baby_goods, baby_goods=strollers. That way you
preserve full detail, and you also a
Personally I would use shop=baby_goods, baby_goods=strollers. That way you
preserve full detail, and you also accomodate data consumers that don't
know about stroller shops.
-- Matthijs
On 4 Apr 2014 10:50, "André Riedel" wrote:
> Should I tag a shop, where I can buy a baby strollers (and only
>
2014-04-03 22:42 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. :
> > Don't dismiss that argument so casually. The current rule is that the
> > way below the bridge should not share a node with the bridge itself.
>
> the current idea that culverts float bellow roads without having anything
> common with them is not correct
Should I tag a shop, where I can buy a baby strollers (and only
strollers, nothing more) as shop=baby_goods ?
Or is it better to use shop=stroller ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbaby_goods
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap
26 matches
Mail list logo
