off list:
André, I'm in the process of ending the addition of 37000 stops of De Lijn
to OSM. None of them have the holy source tags and still I'm able to
compute which ones still need to be done.
So I'm not worried about getting bitten in the back.
I have a system in place which works and which
Dear Stefano,
Accepting the tag landuse=port would improve the detailed tagging of port
areas, for example to tell apart container terminals (easily
distinguishable from satellite imagery) from passenger terminals and so on.
Thank you very much for your good strucutured and very detailed
On 06/07/2014 08:24, nounours77 wrote:
= So this would imply that port is a individual facility inside a
harbour.
In fact it is the other way round. A port my contain one or more
harbours. (In turn, a harbour may contain zero or more docks and a dock
may contain zero or more basins.) A port
2014-07-06 9:48 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Herring malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com:
On 06/07/2014 08:24, nounours77 wrote:
= So this would imply that port is a individual facility inside a
harbour.
In fact it is the other way round. A port my contain one or more harbours.
(In turn, a harbour may
On 06/07/2014 10:45, sabas88 wrote:
Let me know how I can edit / disambiguate.
The important distinction is that a port is an administrative boundary
(which may have several disjunct areas) whereas harbours, terminals,
docks, wharves, basins, quays, etc. are physical features. Since those
2014-07-06 12:48 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Herring malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com:
On 06/07/2014 10:45, sabas88 wrote:
Let me know how I can edit / disambiguate.
The important distinction is that a port is an administrative boundary
(which may have several disjunct areas) whereas harbours,
Am 05/lug/2014 um 23:30 schrieb André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
Lakes usually flow, and I would guess more than canals that are not water
ducts.
They're mostly a river meeting a hole, filling it and overflowing at the
other end.
lakes don't flow. They have a layering of
Am 22/giu/2014 um 11:08 schrieb Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
flow_direction=forward/backward and
oneway=yes ?
not sure if this was already answered, oneway is a legal tag and referring to
traffic on the water, while flow_direction is referring to the water itself.
cheers,
Martin
Am 05/lug/2014 um 22:43 schrieb François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu:
Introducing power_tower=* and power_pole=* to store values instead than
tower=* or pole=* may be a possibility.
Do you agree ?
yes, I'd support this to avoid confusion with tower:type associated
Am 06/lug/2014 um 19:12 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Am 05/lug/2014 um 22:43 schrieb François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu:
Introducing power_tower=* and power_pole=* to store values instead than
tower=* or pole=* may be a possibility.
Do
I know of at least two such in the Nashville, TN, USA. One is Nashville
International Airport, with passenger, air freight, and general aviation usage,
as well as a military compound. The other is a former military base in Smyrna,
TN, still containing a small military compound, but mostly now
On 7/6/14 1:55 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
I know of at least two such in the Nashville, TN, USA. One is Nashville
International Airport, with passenger, air freight, and general aviation
usage, as well as a military compound. The other is a former military base in
Smyrna, TN, still
How about using aerodrome=* to express how the aerodrome is used by
civilians and then add military=yes when the airport is also used
for military operations?
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Ole Nielsen on-...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Also happens outside the US. In Denmark I know of civil airports
On 7/6/14 3:41 PM, Fernando Trebien wrote:
How about using aerodrome=* to express how the aerodrome is used by
civilians and then add military=yes when the airport is also used
for military operations?
you could potentially broaden it a bit, with military=yes being the
generic i have no more
14 matches
Mail list logo
