Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 Thread sabas88
Dear all, I edited the two proposals as required. Regarding the intermodal_terminal, I added a definition and some pictures. Considering the port proposal, I made more extensive changes to make it more similar to other tags, as suggested by Martin. Mainly the idea is to have categories in the port

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 Thread sabas88
2014-07-07 17:47 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2014-07-07 17:21 GMT+02:00 sabas88 : > > As I explained in the talk page previously, I would like to stay with roro >> as a value, because it's more common in the usage. > > > > I still believe you should expand this. It might be more common for

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-07-07 17:21 GMT+02:00 sabas88 : > As I explained in the talk page previously, I would like to stay with roro > as a value, because it's more common in the usage. I still believe you should expand this. It might be more common for specialists to use the abbreviation, but in OSM most mappers

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 Thread sabas88
2014-07-07 17:09 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2014-07-05 14:02 GMT+02:00 sabas88 : > > >> For port proposal and voting page see >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dport >> >> > > In this case there is hardly a definition, it is "hidden" under a > "differences

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 Thread sabas88
2014-07-07 16:50 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss : > This proposal needs EXAMPLES, EXAMPLES and more EXAMPLES!!! > Hi Andreas, thanks for the email.. I will try to follow your suggestion :-) > > I would like to see some examples that show everything in one picture: > habour, ports, port authority bounda

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-07-05 14:02 GMT+02:00 sabas88 : > > For port proposal and voting page see > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dport > > In this case there is hardly a definition, it is "hidden" under a "differences between harbour and port" but there is no clear definition and

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 Thread Andreas Goss
This proposal needs EXAMPLES, EXAMPLES and more EXAMPLES!!! I would like to see some examples that show everything in one picture: habour, ports, port authority boundary +names etc. Should also be of one which highlighs the differences (so not one with just 1 port and where port=habour) I'm ha

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Power transmission refinement - RFC 2

2014-07-07 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Martin, This topic goes on Talk page : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement#Some_suggested_smaller_changes Cheers *François Lacombe* francois dot lacombe At telecom-bretagne dot eu http://www.infos-reseaux.com 2014-07-06 19:13 GMT+02:00 M

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

2014-07-07 Thread Malcolm Herring
To be consistent with the IHO definitions, any use of the word "harbour" should be used for the area of sheltered water and not any land areas. Those land areas adjacent to the harbour water should be classified according to their function (terminal, wharf, etc.) Therefore the tag "landuse=harb