2015-01-26 15:28 GMT+01:00 Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com:
On 26/01/2015 00:01, Simone Saviolo wrote:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=patron_saint%3Ait%3D*+globalR
I swear, I would think that there were more of these. patron_saint:it
seems to be a common suggestion for this purpose in
On 27/01/2015 9:29 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
(This discussion originated on talk - crossposted to tagging on
Malcolm's suggestion)
On 26/01/2015 21:16, Malcolm Herring wrote:
On 26/01/2015 19:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Harbour#Quay
On 28/01/2015 3:26 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:
E.g.: a 17-degree mapped mountain road or San Francisco street's will get
its actual length a 5% bonus compared to its real-life counterpart.
True, but such roads are not very common (17 degree ~= 30%). There are
a few short streets in places like San
I have placed a request to stop these edits on the users talk page and
warned him that I will ban him if this kind of working against the
community continues.
Please let me know if the problem continues, as I don't watch the tagging
list permanently.
Wolfgang
* Martin Vonwald
And dedication was proposed.
As one of the first comments in this thread. Then it was repeated when
dedication:wikidata was mentioned.
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I have noticed a length tag used on some linear ways [1]. It seems
that this is redundant, as the length could be calculated from the
geometry itself. It could also be the source of future errors should
someone split the way, for example to add more detailed tagging, such
as varying smoothness.
I did not read any apology so far, which would be a first step.
I think he was banned from this mailing list for the time being, so he
would have to apologize elsewhere; but I agree that would help make amends.
I would also ask him to avoid making the issues personal.
But to be honest, I don't
2015-01-27 16:13 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe fl.infosrese...@gmail.com:
I personally recommend to use the length key while mapping street cabinets
as nodes.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet
On a node it makes perfect sense. At least as long as it is not
Le 27/01/2015 11:55, Daniel Koć a écrit :
W dniu 27.01.2015 11:25, André Pirard napisał(a):
On 2015-01-27 09:51, Simone Saviolo wrote :
To be correct, the Virgin Mary isn't a saint either ;-)
You should urgently warn the Vatican [3] ! ;-)
It doesn't really matter anyway. =} Someone has
(This discussion originated on talk - crossposted to tagging on
Malcolm's suggestion)
On 26/01/2015 21:16, Malcolm Herring wrote:
On 26/01/2015 19:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Harbour#Quay
mentions that a quay will normally be tagged as
On 2015-01-27 09:51, Simone Saviolo wrote :
2015-01-26 15:28 GMT+01:00 Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com
mailto:doerr.step...@gmail.com:
On 26/01/2015 00:01, Simone Saviolo wrote:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=patron_saint%3Ait%3D*+globalR
I swear, I would think that
2015-01-27 11:25 GMT+01:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
On 2015-01-27 09:51, Simone Saviolo wrote :
2015-01-26 15:28 GMT+01:00 Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com:
On 26/01/2015 00:01, Simone Saviolo wrote:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=patron_saint%3Ait%3D*+globalR
I swear, I
Who has admin power in the Wiki? I again request a ban of this user.
Martin
2015-01-27 11:31 GMT+01:00 jgpacker john.pack...@gmail.com:
Not five minutes later, he already reverted my changes, justifying it as a
single user opinion and undiscussed changed.
I also fixed some of his additions
W dniu 27.01.2015 11:25, André Pirard napisał(a):
On 2015-01-27 09:51, Simone Saviolo wrote :
To be correct, the Virgin Mary isn't a saint either ;-)
You should urgently warn the Vatican [3] ! ;-)
It doesn't really matter anyway. =} Someone has already mentioned on
this thread that
Our friend Никита (user Xxzme in the wiki) put his opinion in the wiki
regardless of the opposition.
Since, as far as I can see, the discussion is still ongoing, I reverted his
changes.
--
View this message in context:
Not five minutes later, he already reverted my changes, justifying it as a
single user opinion and undiscussed changed.
I also fixed some of his additions in other pages, but he is already
reverting them.
It seems he is trying to win the discussion by Fait accompli
Request For Discussion
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:substance
Pipe lines currently exist for non drinking water in various part of the
world. And have done for some time. They are becoming more numerous as
efforts to save water and reduce environmental impacts increase.
Just FYI, at OSM-PL people map highway milestones - as nodes near
highways - which is less prone to error due to people editing
geometry..
The map: http://osmapa.pl/konkursy/pikietaz/
Michał
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Am 27.01.2015 um 16:34 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
2015-01-27 16:26 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe fl.infosrese...@gmail.com
mailto:fl.infosrese...@gmail.com:
In my mind, a road climbing a mountain won't have the same length in
reality than in the DB : the Z dimension may have influence too.
Am 24.01.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
2015-01-24 17:20 GMT+01:00 Никита acr...@gmail.com
mailto:acr...@gmail.com:
Are you an idiot? I mean really.
I hereby request a ban of this individual from this mailing list and I
definitively support an OSM-wide ban.
+1
this user
I just did a quick search in iD. We display the “Length” field only on the
Runway preset.
(I think it does make sense there)
Thanks, Bryan
On Jan 27, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have noticed a length tag used on some linear ways [1]. It seems
that this
2015-01-27 16:26 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe fl.infosrese...@gmail.com:
In my mind, a road climbing a mountain won't have the same length in
reality than in the DB : the Z dimension may have influence too.
Ok - understood. Although I doubt, that there is real usage for that
example. But I had
Hi Mike, hi François, hi all,
I don't find the length=* tag redundant either for linear objects
like streetlines, especially in the case of pretty steep ones: as
they're projected for mapping purposes from 3D to 2D, their actual
length is not the one you measure on the map but you should
Thanks to everyone for sharing their thoughts.
I personally recommend to use the length key while mapping street cabinets as
nodes.
Agree, length makes sense on nodes
The way in OSM is only a (sometimes not precise) drawing of an existing
feature and can be different from the reality.
2015-01-27 16:18 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
But on a way? Hm... Any real-world examples for me?
To be more precise : OSM is based upon a 2D geospatial database.
In my mind, a road climbing a mountain won't have the same length in
reality than in the DB : the Z dimension may
E.g.: a 17-degree mapped mountain road or San Francisco street's will get
its actual length a 5% bonus compared to its real-life counterpart.
True, but such roads are not very common (17 degree ~= 30%). There are
a few short streets in places like San Francisco that are this steep.
In these
Quick note: for milestones, the tag used is distance, not length. There's a
wiki page with all unit tags if you're into that sort of thing:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Michał Brzozowski www.ha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just FYI, at OSM-PL
Le 27/01/2015 16:34, Martin Vonwald a écrit :
Ok - understood. Although I doubt, that there is real usage for that
example. But I had a quick look in overpass: besides aeroways it is
quite often used on bridges and tunnels, where the actual (official)
length can be observed. Makes sense.
On 01/25/2015 10:29 AM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
Probable all christian churches (buildings) and most chapels are dedicated
to patron saints.
E.g. the Basilica Sancti Petri (Saint Peter's Basilica) in Vatican City is
obviously dedicated to Sanctus Petrus (Saint Peter). As in this example, the
29 matches
Mail list logo
