Well, perhaps I misunderstood the proposal. It sounded to me like the
proposal was that a store aimed at selling building materials to
professional builders, but not the general public, would simply be tagged
shop=trade, with no further qualifiers to specify what trade was intended.
--
John F.
Andy Townsend wrote on 2015-10-22 12:46:
On 22/10/2015 11:18, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2015-10-22 11:27, Andy Townsend wrote:
I'd agree with that. I can think of more than a few examples of "the road/path used
to go here, but now it doesn't", and even if the imagery gets updated, underlying
On 22/10/2015 11:18, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2015-10-22 11:27, Andy Townsend wrote:
I'd agree with that. I can think of more than a few examples of "the
road/path used to go here, but now it doesn't", and even if the
imagery gets updated, underlying GPS traces won't.
Has anyone thought of a
On 2015-10-22 11:27, Andy Townsend wrote:
> I'd agree with that. I can think of more than a few examples of "the
> road/path used to go here, but now it doesn't", and even if the imagery gets
> updated, underlying GPS traces won't.
Has anyone thought of a way of limiting returned GPS trace
On 22/10/2015 06:29, GerdP wrote:
Hi all,
I've contacted a few mappers and it seems that there is a need
to keep some of the ways for the reason described by Mateusz below.
I'd agree with that. I can think of more than a few examples of "the
road/path used to go here, but now it doesn't", an
