On 6/10/2016 12:56 AM, Amacri wrote:
Hi,
Tag place=isolated_dwelling, which should be used to name an almost
unpopulated place (often in the mountains), can be currently defined
as node (point) or polygon (area), but not as a way (line). Same
consideration for place=hamlet or place=locality:
> On a general note - when things are mapped as nodes this is frequently
> done with the implicit notion that this is a location with a certain
> tolerance margin. You might think of mapping something with a linear way
> as a method to specify an anisotropic tolerance, well localized in one
> di
Hi,
In April I posted a message here about a proposal to extend the tagging
of Kneipp facilities. Thanks to some comments, I was able to improve the
proposal. I have integrated the changes dirrectly in the existing
proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extending_knei
On Thursday 09 June 2016, Amacri wrote:
>
> Provided that marking such areas with polylines can lead to
> inappropriate tagging as the boundaries are not well definable, they
> do not deserve just a point, as they may represent an extended area,
> that can be shaped through its text (often the orig
"Amacri" writes:
> Tag place=isolated_dwelling, which should be used to name an almost
> unpopulated place (often in the mountains), can be currently defined as node
> (point) or polygon (area), but not as a way (line). Same consideration for
> place=hamlet or place=locality: using way is not al
Hi,
Tag place=isolated_dwelling, which should be used to name an almost
unpopulated place (often in the mountains), can be currently defined as node
(point) or polygon (area), but not as a way (line). Same consideration for
place=hamlet or place=locality: using way is not allowed for them.