Very interesting clarification and links, thanks Christoph, the problem is
well spotted there.
A general concept would be related to pros and cons of an automated model,
able to differentiate rendering of rural PoIs (e.g., a query related to a
newly introduced automated density layer or to
2016-06-17 19:30 GMT+02:00 Amacri :
> Would “landmark=yes” be appropriate? It is not yet documented here
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:landmark=no
> but there is a discussion here
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:landmark. Is there some
>
On Friday 17 June 2016, Amacri wrote:
> Many trekkers and bikers consider that the current Mapnik style
> provides an unsightly rendering of mountain areas and I am with them.
> Among the many aspects that would need improvement, there is a need
> that notable places which are effective references
Many trekkers and bikers consider that the current Mapnik style provides an
unsightly rendering of mountain areas and I am with them. Among the many
aspects that would need improvement, there is a need that notable places
which are effective references in a mountainous area could not only be shown
2016-06-17 12:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć :
> But parcel receiving also does not include direct payment (at least I was
> using just a pass code to open),
>
+1, yes, parcel receiving also has nothing to do with vending. Even if you
had to directly pay something, it still would not be
W dniu 17.06.2016 8:00, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
So your pinball example is still invalid, as expected, but laundromat
fits this definition IMO.
it doesn't, because nothing is dispensed after payment
OK, now I see you're right.
parcel sending is something different and is wrongly
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 16 giu 2016, alle ore 21:37, Daniel Koć ha scritto:
>
> English is not my mother tongue, but I see here nothing about selling - just
> "dispencing" (which means "releasing", I guess).
vending comes from latin and means selling
dispensing after