[Tagging] R: Landmarks and viewpoints

2016-06-17 Thread Amacri
Very interesting clarification and links, thanks Christoph, the problem is well spotted there. A general concept would be related to pros and cons of an automated model, able to differentiate rendering of rural PoIs (e.g., a query related to a newly introduced automated density layer or to

Re: [Tagging] Landmarks and viewpoints

2016-06-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-06-17 19:30 GMT+02:00 Amacri : > Would “landmark=yes” be appropriate? It is not yet documented here > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:landmark=no > but there is a discussion here > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:landmark. Is there some >

Re: [Tagging] Landmarks and viewpoints

2016-06-17 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Friday 17 June 2016, Amacri wrote: > Many trekkers and bikers consider that the current Mapnik style > provides an unsightly rendering of mountain areas and I am with them. > Among the many aspects that would need improvement, there is a need > that notable places which are effective references

[Tagging] Landmarks and viewpoints

2016-06-17 Thread Amacri
Many trekkers and bikers consider that the current Mapnik style provides an unsightly rendering of mountain areas and I am with them. Among the many aspects that would need improvement, there is a need that notable places which are effective references in a mountainous area could not only be shown

Re: [Tagging] Laundromat and parcel box (vending machines)

2016-06-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-06-17 12:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć : > But parcel receiving also does not include direct payment (at least I was > using just a pass code to open), > +1, yes, parcel receiving also has nothing to do with vending. Even if you had to directly pay something, it still would not be

Re: [Tagging] Laundromat and parcel box (vending machines)

2016-06-17 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 17.06.2016 8:00, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a): So your pinball example is still invalid, as expected, but laundromat fits this definition IMO. it doesn't, because nothing is dispensed after payment OK, now I see you're right. parcel sending is something different and is wrongly

Re: [Tagging] Laundromat and parcel box (vending machines)

2016-06-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 16 giu 2016, alle ore 21:37, Daniel Koć ha scritto: > > English is not my mother tongue, but I see here nothing about selling - just > "dispencing" (which means "releasing", I guess). vending comes from latin and means selling dispensing after