Am 28.04.2017 um 02:04 schrieb Warin:
On 28-Apr-17 09:43 AM, John Willis wrote:
When tagging a large facility I need:
- car(understood)
- car with trailer (usual in home renovation/building centres)
-bus
-"large" (truck/tanker/semi,etc)
-motorbike (understood)
-disabled car only
-disabled
> On Apr 28, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Most of the 'amenity' for disabled places seams to be a wider parking area
> (to allow doors to fully open with space for a wheelchair) with close
> proximity to the entry.
Below are some amenities that are common here for
On 28-Apr-17 09:43 AM, John Willis wrote:
Very large facilities often have separated parking for various types of
vehicles. We represent these with basic tags - car, bicycle, motorbike parking,
but I am wondering how to tag large vehicle parking (semi trucks and similar
size), bus parking (dis
On 27-Apr-17 01:43 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
do we need the same tags for motorhomes ?
Off topic. They get a mention on the caravan_site wiki page. I think they are
represented by caravan at this time.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site
I recently start seeing rest
Very large facilities often have separated parking for various types of
vehicles. We represent these with basic tags - car, bicycle, motorbike parking,
but I am wondering how to tag large vehicle parking (semi trucks and similar
size), bus parking (distinct in many parking lots catering to touri
The links around my city have links_lower and links_higher tags so the
renderer can use those if they prefer. It works a treat.
(I raised this a few years ago and got shot down by people saying "you
can't change this now").
Some problems have no acceptable solutions...
On 27 Apr 2017 22:37, "dja
Hello,
I was thinking that the Michelin style is better than the osm style in
rendering link roads : on Michelin maps, the link road refers to the lowest
road level, which is better to visualize small or big exits.
Julien Djakk (http://itineraires.de.bus.free.fr)
--
View this message in cont
> On Apr 23, 2017, at 6:33 AM, Dave F wrote:
>
> Where appropriate I've been mapping them as 'full areas' by which I mean a
> polygon which encompasses the boundary of the property to include all parts
> such as garden, play area, car park etc.
Perfect. Landuse=retail and the rest of the i
