[Tagging] Bus stop without infrastructure

Hi, I started to gather some info about existing practices to map and tag bus stops without infrastructure. Please read there: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform#Bus_stop_without_infrastructure I would appreciate your comments and additions. -- althio

Re: [Tagging] aeroway=spaceport, aeroway=launchpad, aeroway=landingpad

2017-05-01 23:14 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug OSM : > [...] changing without reviewing cases individually this one? It leaves a bit of a bad taste if you declare on the mailing list 'I'm getting tired of this "discussion and proposal" stuff' and then it gets discovered you downloaded

Re: [Tagging] Very large multipolygons

2017-05-02 12:10 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > I agree there is no point in mapping this kind of feature as > multipolygons in OSM but i disagree that changing type=multipolygon to > type=boundary makes it any better. > +1 I thought about how this kind of feature could be

[Tagging] RFC: Change the definition of key:aeroway to include space flight related infrastructure

Please comment on the discussion page of the proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/include_spacecraft_in_aeroway Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Very large multipolygons

On Tuesday 02 May 2017, Frederik Ramm wrote: > [...] > > I realize that what I've done here is close to "mapping for the data > extractor" and I'm offering these decisions for discussion here. I > definitely think none of the three areas qualifies as a proper > "multipolygon" and *if* these huge

Re: [Tagging] Very large multipolygons

Am 02.05.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hi, I have removed three very large multipolygons from OSM today. * I DELETED a "place=sea" for the Adriatic Sea (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4590486) because I think we shouldn't even start with that kind of thing (place=ocean

Re: [Tagging] mandatory restriction with via way as members

Am 02.05.2017 um 10:11 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: On 2. May 2017, at 08:53, Michael Tsang wrote: What would you say this restriction means? Does it mean that once a vehicle starts the from way it must go along the whole length to the to way? it means you can't go any

[Tagging] Very large multipolygons

Hi, I have removed three very large multipolygons from OSM today. * I DELETED a "place=sea" for the Adriatic Sea (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4590486) because I think we shouldn't even start with that kind of thing (place=ocean name=Atlantic anyone?). * I CHANGED a

Re: [Tagging] wikipedia links and copy + paste in tag definitions

sent from a phone > On 2. May 2017, at 02:17, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > But without knowing a lot about the story and mechanisms behind it, the > link you quoted above doesn't seem wrong. It is not called "castle" but > "structure tagged as historic=castle in OSM", and the

Re: [Tagging] mandatory restriction with via way as members

sent from a phone > On 2. May 2017, at 08:53, Michael Tsang wrote: > > What would you say this restriction means? Does it mean that once a vehicle > starts the from way it must go along the whole length to the to way? it means you can't go any other way than to the to

Re: [Tagging] mandatory restriction with via way as members

This is just a fictional example, but I have created a real-world restriction: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7156063 What would you say this restriction means? Does it mean that once a vehicle starts the from way it must go along the whole length to the to way?