Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

There is no fence. In fact, the boundary as I've drawn it is a very, very rough approximation. The State of Alaska in an extreme case of stupidity won't provide the coordinates of such leases (or of its state parks or recreation areas either) to the general public. It's only there to define an

Re: [Tagging] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-10-13 23:25 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan : > I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service. It allows > users to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review each > suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on each change if they think it's a >

Re: [Tagging] Route=* for ways ?

For clarity, could you post a link of the way? Is there a highway tag? Many misinterpret the use of 'route'. It should only be used as a relation to describe a route using many different types of highway.or where a way needs to share many routes. route=piste

Re: [Tagging] Route=* for ways ?

I would feel free to correct: Individual ways shouldn’t have a route=* on them in my opinion. Tod > On Oct 15, 2017, at 11:51 AM, yvecai wrote: > > I have a concern with this page: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dpiste > > Somebody found it useful to

[Tagging] Route=* for ways ?

I have a concern with this page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dpiste Somebody found it useful to document the usage of the route=piste tag on ways, That looks strange to me, and rather contradict the usage. The original page before june 2017 was concerning relations

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

On Sunday 15 October 2017, Dave Swarthout wrote: > I agree that tagging the entire lease area as landuse=industrial is > not correct. Part of the reason for posting is that I'm looking for > alternative ways to tag the large lease areas. Is there a boundary > tag that someone can suggest? I am

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-15 15:14 GMT+02:00 Dave Swarthout : > I agree that tagging the entire lease area as landuse=industrial is not > correct. Part of the reason for posting is that I'm looking for alternative > ways to tag the large lease areas. Is there a boundary tag that someone

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

I agree that tagging the entire lease area as landuse=industrial is not correct. Part of the reason for posting is that I'm looking for alternative ways to tag the large lease areas. Is there a boundary tag that someone can suggest? Also, someone suggested tagging the wellsite with

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

Hi Additionnaly, it's recommended to use dedicated tag instead of industrial=* (or as general man_made) Eg. power substation are mapped as power=substation and not industrial=substation oil=wellsite sounds great Think about using man_made=pipeline + substance=oil to link wellsites to processing

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

On Sunday 15 October 2017, Dave Swarthout wrote: > I'm trying to determine the ideal tagging scenario for the many oil > fields in the State of Alaska. The areas, which are large tracts of > land leased from the State of Alaska, are typically very large > (50-100 sq miles) and are mostly empty

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

>Martin wrote: I’d use man_made for the wellsite, as it’s a „feature“ Since I sent that post I was leaning that way also, except now I'm not sure the Alpine Central Facility is actually a wellsite after all. AFAIK, It is an aggregator for many small pipelines and I believe it pressurizes and

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

sent from a phone > On 15. Oct 2017, at 04:39, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > So, inside this leased tract are oil well sites, (one of which is here: > 70.4189462, -150.9128577) and a larger pumping/aggregating site known as the > Alpine Central Facility (70.3445186,