Re: [Tagging] Feature request - nascar=*

On 11/19/17 7:07 PM, ralph.ayt...@ntlworld.com wrote: > > I also noticed that. In fact the example given in the proposal > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/25.45387/-80.40864 is the > Homestead-Miami Speedway which hosts not just Nascar but a whole range > of different events by different

Re: [Tagging] Feature request - nascar=*

Can you explain the difference between a F1 pit stall an a Nascar one ? I don't understand why all those elements have to be placed in the nascar namespace. I would expect a more general tag that can also be used for other organisations of car races regards m. On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 8:10 PM,

Re: [Tagging] Feature request - nascar=*

I also noticed that. In fact the example given in the proposal http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/25.45387/-80.40864 is the Homestead-Miami Speedway which hosts not just Nascar but a whole range of different events by different companies and sponsors,(IndyCar Series, Sports Car Championships

Re: [Tagging] Feature request - nascar=*

Isn't nascar a private company not a 'sport'? Similar to the touring circus that is Formula1? Aren't the tracks used by other racing categories? On 19/11/2017 19:10, Kurzov Productions wrote: Hello, subscribers of the tagging mailing list... I have created a feature proposal in order to

[Tagging] Feature request - nascar=*

Hello, subscribers of the tagging mailing list... I have created a feature proposal in order to more easily map motorsports tracks, most specifically NASCAR tracks. A link can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ Proposed_features/nascar. Although this is not a formal RFC, I

Re: [Tagging] Variable Message Signs on Highways

I think it is an interesting question. I explain my opinion about that. Instead of being about one kind of information, as their name its called variable it is not possible to determine in all cases what exact information you will have from them. But you can map about the types because of the kind

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

They prepare for academic exams but a cram school's purpose of existence is not actual academic education. They do not teach, they cram, just as their name implies. They employ various preparation for multiple-choice or other tests and memorization techniques for "mastering" these tests. A

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

I think a bit like Simon and Christoph, but if the goal is to vote on the opportunity of a reform, I'd stay open about the final scheme. Yves Le 19 novembre 2017 12:19:48 GMT+01:00, Simon Poole a écrit : > >[Christoph pressed send before I did, sigh] > >While I'm a bit

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

You are right, I meaned *specialty schools*. Somehow I mixed lines in my copt-paste. But the definition, as it appears in the proposal, keeps being confusing, since you include "exam preparation but not cramming" into specialty schools. Cramming is some kind of exam preparation, so maybe you

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

[Christoph pressed send before I did, sigh] While I'm a bit undecided on if we need an education reform at all and you need to make clear what the voting is actually on, the underlying proposal is far from ready for any kind of vote or usage at this point in time. You need to at least provide a

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Education Reform

On Saturday 18 November 2017, Erkin Alp Gc3bcney wrote: > I am offering this proposal into voting as no replies arrived since > last month. I just had a look over your draft and i like your approach although as others have said it is not quite clear why the change is needed for many