Re: [Tagging] traffic_signals:lanes? (specific signal types for certain lanes)

The situation might not be common, but applying the :lanes methodology to the key traffic_signals is just a logical extension of existing conventions. I wasn't aware traffic_signals:continuous_green was so uncommon; I just noticed it documented on the wiki and figured it must be at least somewhat

Re: [Tagging] traffic_signals:lanes? (specific signal types for certain lanes)

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 5:04 PM, yo paseopor wrote: > I will not discuss here if continuous_green would be a realistic value > with full possibilities in a future. But according to taginfo [1] there are > only 6 nodes around the world. > Also I am asking myself: if continuous_green is continuous

Re: [Tagging] traffic_signals:lanes? (specific signal types for certain lanes)

I will not discuss here if continuous_green would be a realistic value with full possibilities in a future. But according to taginfo [1] there are only 6 nodes around the world. Also I am asking myself: if continuous_green is continuous green really...is it usefull for the map? (because there is no

[Tagging] traffic_signals:lanes? (specific signal types for certain lanes)

Consider this intersection. The traffic signal is for a one-way entrance ramp, so westbound traffic never stops, instead getting a continuous green. The only signal phasing is to stop the eastbound traffic to allow westbound left turns to proceed onto the ramp, an

Re: [Tagging] cycleway:both=no in StreetComplete

Wish for the New Year: a world where all streets have cycleways and hence cycleway=no is a useful tag to indicate the few exceptions. More realistically, cycleway=no is useful to indicate that someone has verified there is no cycleway. For example to indicate that the large sidewalk that is clearl