Re: [Tagging] iD news - v2.6.0 lots of new features...

I can’t think of any reason off the top of my head, but anything is possible.. Please open an issue here, thanks!: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues Bryan > On Jan 22, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: >

Re: [Tagging] iD news - v2.6.0 lots of new features...

On 23 January 2018 at 02:48, Bryan Housel wrote: > Happy 2018! I just released iD v2.6.0 yesterday.. > Thank you & your team for all your hard work - some of these, especially the brightness control will be very handy! One question though - could this update have

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

Regarding power plants involving lakes upstream of tunnels or pipelines, this won't affect the current proposal : lakes are mapped as areas waterway=riverbanks or natural=water or whatever. But tunnels / drains / pipelines connects to streams/river feeding the lake (watershed) and not to

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

This has been under RFC for 2 month. I'm not native English speaker so please, you decide. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/pressurize https://dictionary.cambridge.org/fr/dictionnaire/anglais/pressurized Both stands for pressurised in British English. François 2018-01-22 21:06

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

ize is correct British English spelling - see the Oxford English Dictionary. Steve Sent from my iPhone > On 22 Jan 2018, at 19:14, Colin Smale wrote: > > How about waterway=pressurised (with an s instead of a z) for correct > (British) English spelling which (unless

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

Hi Colin, This is right, I've missed the "uk usual" here : https://dictionary.cambridge.org/fr/dictionnaire/anglais/pressurized I think I can change this without breaking anything. All the best François 2018-01-22 20:14 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale : > How about

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

How about waterway=pressurised (with an s instead of a z) for correct (British) English spelling which (unless I have missed something) is still the lingua franca of OSM? On 2018-01-22 19:40, François Lacombe wrote: > Hi Volker, > > waterway=pressurized is compatible with both standard and

Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2018-01-22 17:25 GMT+01:00 Fernando Trebien : >> - sett: hewn stones with flat top, wide filled gaps, comfortable to >> cycle and walk on, uncomfortable on high heels [today's image

Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 22.01.2018 17:25, Fernando Trebien wrote: >> - sett: hewn stones with flat top (...) [2] (...)> - cobblestone: hewn >> stones with slightly arched top (...) images [3] > and [4] > > I don't believe requiring mappers

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

Hi Volker, waterway=pressurized is compatible with both standard and pumping hydropower plants. The doesn't cover power parts and hydraulic parts may be the same. I've tested this tagging on a site with 2 different power plants, one is pumping and the second is standard (last is used to power up

Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

2018-01-22 17:25 GMT+01:00 Fernando Trebien : > - paving_stones: blocks or stones with smooth flat top, tight gaps > [same images as today] > ok > - sett: hewn stones with flat top, wide filled gaps, comfortable to > cycle and walk on, uncomfortable on high heels

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

I would suggest to have something similar for the thousands of water pumping stations here in the Veneto region of Northern Italy (Po valley), and most likely hundreds of thousands world-wide. Not sure if it makes sense to put it in the same proposal. Certainly some components are identical at

Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

On 22.01.2018 17:25, Fernando Trebien wrote: > - sett: hewn stones with flat top (...) [2] (...)> - cobblestone: hewn stones > with slightly arched top (...) images [3] and [4] I don't believe requiring mappers to make a distinction between these two is a good idea. Let's look at your images: >

Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

Seems to be a good idea for me. Requires rushing of real cobblestones, but solves problem of mixing setts colloquially named cobblestone and real cobblestone. So we stop pretending that current tags are correctly used and increase changes that we can distinguish cobblestone and uneven sett. On

Re: [Tagging] Sidewalks and cycleways as tags vs as extra lines and StreetComplete

On 22/01/2018 16:05, Fernando Trebien wrote: Undone. Thanks But we need to talk about how messy the scheme is becoming by mapping cycleways and sidewalks differently when separate from the main way. To be honest I wouldn't worry too much about how complicated the tagging scheme is, as long as

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

Thanks Martin, Indeed, such power plant are very interesting and sometimes really huge. It can be an additional criteria for waterway=pressurized since water between plant and storage always and necessarily pipe flows. I'll think to add it during wiki cleanup if applicable François *François

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

Great proposal, I just wanted to mention that there are also pumped storage plants (fr:Pompage-turbinage), where the upper reservoir is filled by means of pumps (in case of ecessive power available) and not naturally by a river or similar.

[Tagging] iD news - v2.6.0 lots of new features...

Happy 2018! I just released iD v2.6.0 yesterday..  Release Highlights -  You can now adjust imagery brightness, contrast, saturation, and sharpness. (Not currently available in Internet Explorer or Edge) Try enhancing the background imagery by opening the Background pane (shortcut “B")

[Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

Hi all, This proposal is now available for voting https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hydropower_water_supplies This picture summarizes the topic a bit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Waterway_flows.png Main goal is to involve pressurized waterways in the global

[Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

Hello, Following from this analysis [1], I would like to propose that we abandon cobblestone:flattened, define the new value cobblestone:raised for a rare case, and redefine existing values as follows: - paving_stones: blocks or stones with smooth flat top, tight gaps [same images as today] -

Re: [Tagging] Sidewalks and cycleways as tags vs as extra lines and StreetComplete

Undone. But we need to talk about how messy the scheme is becoming by mapping cycleways and sidewalks differently when separate from the main way. We have sidewalk=separate [1] on the main way to express that a sidewalk was mapped separately. We have footway=sidewalk [2] on the separate way to

Re: [Tagging] Sidewalks and cycleways as tags vs as extra lines and StreetComplete

On 15/01/2018 14:47, Fernando Trebien wrote: When mapping sidewalks and cycleways, it is possible to do so as tags on the line of the motorised way [1][2] or as standalone lines parallel to it [1][3]. You've recently changed the wiki to suggest that sidewalk=sidepath is valid:

Re: [Tagging] How to tag shop areas in a shopping mall ?

2018-01-21 19:11 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr : > I believe the list of tags that needs to be extended to fix the issue is > the same as it was with a similar issue (overlapping way warning with > waterway=riverbank), but I'm not very familiar with JOSM's codebase: >

Re: [Tagging] Sidewalks and cycleways as tags vs as extra lines and StreetComplete

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:49 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > Two nice examples of complex cases, which in my view would be best tagged > using the cycleway=lane tag and separate foot- and cycle-ways (both are at > present not yet correctly tagged in OSM) Very nice examples indeed.