Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

How about tourism=attraction attraction=flowers There are similar areas in Thailand for sunflowers. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, 7:29 AM John Willis wrote: > TL:DR - we need a “flower field” tag or a variant of flowerbed. tat is > not related to farming, but more to garden or tourism.

[Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

TL:DR - we need a “flower field” tag or a variant of flowerbed. tat is not related to farming, but more to garden or tourism. This is a tag for the field itself, not the entire location, which may need a garden:type=spectacle value to define it.

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations for commercial vehicles etc

sent from a phone > On 8. Apr 2018, at 16:04, Tijmen Stam wrote: > > I myself are for a subset of amenity=charging_station / bus=yes / > access=private > > However, the is a misnomer, as there is no "socket" like the > common Tesla and ChaDeMo types. > > Any

Re: [Tagging] landuse=forest + ref=* : parcel number or what?

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 12:21:16 + > David Marchal wrote: > >> despite being widely used, ref=* is not rendered for landuse=forest > > Note that just because tag is widely used it does not mean that

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 7:24 AM, ael wrote: > No. Railway platform for the raised area to match the floor level of > trains is entirely standard. Platform normally means a raised structure > so it applies to the entry floor of a bus, but not to the ground level > waiting

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 18:17 +0100, Steve Doerr wrote: > On 08/04/2018 13:45, Paul Allen wrote: > > A bus stop is a bus stop.  Unless > > it's at a bus station, in which case it's a stance. > > I've never heard it called a stance, and the Oxford English > Dictionary  > shows that this use of the

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 19:01 +0200, Jo wrote: > > > 2018-04-08 17:37 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes : > > > > > > That is referring to the stops (or stands) within the bus station. > > The > > overall area is Gorsaf Bws, same as as Railway Station (Gorsaf > > Reilffordd) and

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On 08/04/2018 13:45, Paul Allen wrote: A bus stop is a bus stop.  Unless it's at a bus station, in which case it's a stance. I've never heard it called a stance, and the Oxford English Dictionary shows that this use of the word is Scottish. -- Steve --- This email has been checked for

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

2018-04-08 17:37 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes : > On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 15:52 +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Philip Barnes > > wrote: > > > Almost, Safle Bws is a bus stop. A bus station is Gorsaf Bws :) > > > > > > Phil

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 15:52 +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Philip Barnes > wrote: > > Almost, Safle Bws is a bus stop. A bus station is Gorsaf Bws :) > > > > Phil (trigpoint) > > Let me look at my local bus station (well, what passes for one). >

Re: [Tagging] Charging stations for commercial vehicles etc

On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:04:33 +0200 Tijmen Stam wrote: > Any suggestions? I am tempted to tag it as man_made=charging_station, but maybe amenity=charging_station + access=* is really better. ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Philip Barnes wrote: > > Almost, Safle Bws is a bus stop. A bus station is Gorsaf Bws :) > > Phil (trigpoint) > Let me look at my local bus station (well, what passes for one). Stands A, B, C, D and E. Stand A consists of 4 bus shelters

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 01:45:31PM +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:49 PM, ael wrote: > > > > > In the context of buses, it tends to refer to the part of the vehicle > > where people may stand to alight or board. > > > > In my part of the UK, we

[Tagging] Charging stations for commercial vehicles etc

For cars there is amenity=charging_station that allow one to plug in a cable. But in the Netherlands (and other places in Europe) there are now charging stations for buses that are so specific that they will probably not be used by vehicles other than the operator's, but maybe soon there

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 13:45 +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:49 PM, ael > wrote: > > In the context of buses, it tends to refer to the part of the > > vehicle > > where people may stand to alight or board. > > > > In my part of the UK, we never

Re: [Tagging] landuse=forest + ref=* : parcel number or what?

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 12:21:16 + David Marchal wrote: > despite being widely used, ref=* is not rendered for landuse=forest Note that just because tag is widely used it does not mean that author(s) of this specific map style must render it.

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

Same in Ireland, I don't think I ever hear any part of a bus referred to as a platform, possibly because we didn't have those Routemaster buses with open boarding areas. And yes, a bus stop is a bus stop, plain and simple. It is not a platform because there is normally no raised structure. Rail

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:49 PM, ael wrote: > > In the context of buses, it tends to refer to the part of the vehicle > where people may stand to alight or board. > > In my part of the UK, we never referred to that part of a bus as a platform. The old AEC Routemaster

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 12:09:58AM +0200, "Christian Müller" wrote: > > Sent: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 22:51:40 +0100 > > From: ael > > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms > > > > > If I'm not mistaken, the

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 12:09:58AM +0200, "Christian Müller" wrote: > > Sent: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 22:51:40 +0100 > > From: ael > > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms > > > > > If I'm not mistaken, the