Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:spacing=*

> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Koć > Sent: Monday, 7 May 2018 06:03 > > However I think that measuring spacing is worse than just measuring > the number of trees. It's more mapper friendly and less error prone. I've you have a long road with trees along it, it's easy and fast to est

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

Here in Belgium the public transport operator has school services that run once or twice in each direction per school day. Anyone with a valid ticket can take them though. So no exclusivity for school children. There are other buses, organised by the schools themselves, which I also wouldn't map.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

2018-05-06 11:21 GMT+02:00 Jo : > The foot tram routes definitely only if there are signs along the road, > indicating at what time the children are expected to be there. > > the walking_bus seems like a school bus, but without an actual vehicle. > There are stops with times that the 'bus' passes

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:spacing=*

sent from a phone > On 6. May 2018, at 22:03, Daniel Koć wrote: > > We use address > interpolation exactly because it's nice to know even if you don't have > the time to add specific address points. if you look at taghistory you can see addr:interpolation is almost standing still for 2 yea

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:spacing=*

sent from a phone > On 6. May 2018, at 04:36, > wrote: > > Exactly locating and mapping every single tree along a long tree row can take > hours. And in the majority of cases, you are probably not going to be much > more exact than a tree_row with spacing would have been, given the usual s

Re: [Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

sent from a phone > On 6. May 2018, at 14:27, Bryan Housel wrote: > > Hey all, this is something I added to iD because we can’t support reusing the > `service=*` tag to also store values for vehicle services. introducing undocumented and formerly unused tags via preset without any discus

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:spacing=*

W dniu 06.05.2018 o 04:36, osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au pisze: > I very much see this as a valid intermediate solution. Getting an > estimate of the average spacing between trees along a tree row takes > seconds. I also think it's better to have something like this. We use address interpola

Re: [Tagging] tagging LPG only station

When I saw your email, I looked for a lpg station near my home and I saw I had to include your lpg-only tags on it (changeset #: 58738167). I still have to check if it is taxi only or general purpose lpg station. Yours, Jose El dom., 6 de mayo de 2018 20:15, Thilo Haug OSM escribió: > fuel:die

Re: [Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

2018-05-06 14:27 GMT+02:00 Bryan Housel : > Hey all, this is something I added to iD because we can’t support reusing > the `service=*` tag to also store values for vehicle services. The tag is > already overwhelmingly used to hold values for `highway=service` and > `railway=service`. > > So we a

Re: [Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

How about leaving away both, the prefix service:vehicle is IMHO needless car:repair car:parts car:rental etc., same for bicycle, would express the same ? Am 06.05.2018 um 14:27 schrieb Bryan Housel: > Hey all, this is something I added to iD because we can’t support > reusing the `service=*` tag

Re: [Tagging] tagging LPG only station

fuel:diesel=no fuel:octane_91=no fuel:octane_95=no fuel:octane_98=no fuel:e10=no Am 06.05.2018 um 18:52 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > How to tag fuel station with only LPG fuel? > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel and > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:fue

[Tagging] tagging LPG only station

How to tag fuel station with only LPG fuel? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:fuel:lpg failed to

Re: [Tagging] Is it possible to have highway=unclassified with ref tag?

The use of the ref tag for highway authority road numbers is controversial in the UK (no road with a signed number would be as low as highway=unclassified). There may be better examples in other countries. -- Andrew From: Philip Barnes Sent: 06 May 2018 13:2

Re: [Tagging] Is it possible to have highway=unclassified with ref tag?

On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Philip Barnes wrote: > On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 09:41 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > I am pretty sure that it is entirely possible to have > > highway=unclassified > > with officially assigned and posted ref number, but I wanted to check > > whatever my edit on h

Re: [Tagging] Is it possible to have highway=unclassified with ref tag?

On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I am pretty sure that it is entirely possible to have highway=unclassified > with officially assigned and posted ref number, but I wanted to check > whatever my edit on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway% > 3Dunclassified > w

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

sent from a phone > On 4. May 2018, at 17:21, > wrote: > > Also, public_transport=platform is only valid with at least one transport > type specific tag, e.g. bus=yes or tram=yes. So there should probably be a > walkingbus=yes or walking_bus=yes tag on that. (Whichever is chosen, it > sh

Re: [Tagging] Is it possible to have highway=unclassified with ref tag?

On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 09:41 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I am pretty sure that it is entirely possible to have > highway=unclassified > with officially assigned and posted ref number, but I wanted to check > whatever my edit on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3 > Dunclassified

Re: [Tagging] service:vehicle: prefix

Hey all, this is something I added to iD because we can’t support reusing the `service=*` tag to also store values for vehicle services. The tag is already overwhelmingly used to hold values for `highway=service` and `railway=service`. So we added `service:vehicle` for users to tag these, and i

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

The foot tram routes definitely only if there are signs along the road, indicating at what time the children are expected to be there. the walking_bus seems like a school bus, but without an actual vehicle. There are stops with times that the 'bus' passes there and there is a fixed itinerary. I su

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

I don't mean that they shouldn't be mapped but that I'd rather not use the public transport scheme for it. On 6 May 2018 at 10:53, Erkin Alp Güney wrote: > What about foot tram routes? Should they be mapped? > > > 06-05-2018 11:51 tarihinde Selfish Seahorse yazdı: >> Hi, >> >> Like Martin, I thin

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

What about foot tram routes? Should they be mapped? 06-05-2018 11:51 tarihinde Selfish Seahorse yazdı: > Hi, > > Like Martin, I think the public transport scheme should not be used > here, because a walking bus is neither a form of transport nor is it > really public. > > > On 6 May 2018 at 09:45

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

Hi, Like Martin, I think the public transport scheme should not be used here, because a walking bus is neither a form of transport nor is it really public. On 6 May 2018 at 09:45, Lorenzo Stucchi wrote: > Hi, > I’m sorry for the error that I made using the old Public Transport scheme, > so acco

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

Hi, I’m sorry for the error that I made using the old Public Transport scheme, so according to what was proposed before I correct the page proposing the tag: walikingbus=yes to be used with public_transport=platform like was now proposed in the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_

[Tagging] Is it possible to have highway=unclassified with ref tag?

I am pretty sure that it is entirely possible to have highway=unclassified with officially assigned and posted ref number, but I wanted to check whatever my edit on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified was