Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

Entirely up to the designer of the renderer. On Thu, 17 May 2018 07:45 Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > Thanks everybody for confirming what I thought & offering a possible > alternative - I'll pass that on to the mapper concerned. > > Just to clarify though? > > If things

Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

Thanks everybody for confirming what I thought & offering a possible alternative - I'll pass that on to the mapper concerned. Just to clarify though? If things are tagged as "Proposed", they will then disappear off the map completely, or will still be visible "greyed out" or something? Thanks

[Tagging] Weighbridges for containers

Hello, since two years an IMO regulation requires the weighing of full shipping containers and this caused the increase of weighing stations, often grouped together in the same facility. I wanted to map some of them and opted for using the existing tag amenity = weighbridge[0] but on an area

Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

sent from a phone > On 16. May 2018, at 09:47, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > many official plans never result in anything changing on the ground. somehow official plans always change something, because people react accordingly, but it doesn’t mean that something

Re: [Tagging] Follow up re Aviation Obstacle lights

15. May 2018 05:43 by graemefi...@gmail.com : > Hi > Following up on the previous discussions re Aviation Obstacle lights to see > if there was any final decision? No. And it is unlikely to happen. Closest thing to final decision is wide usage of tag by

Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

16. May 2018 01:05 by graemefi...@gmail.com : > Am I correct in telling them that it should only be on the map if it's on the > ground (or water in this case!), so please delete everything & add it as it > actually get's built / becomes operational?  I agree