Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

On 30/05/18 21:55, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 30. May 2018 00:31 by 61sundow...@gmail.com : In that case I would tag intermittent=summer (...) The tags should 'make sense' without requiring further explanation ... as that generates these kind of

Re: [Tagging] marking shop as street vendor

28. May 2018 07:51 by josem...@gmail.com : > Three years ago I read about rules for street vendors in my city, Madrid. The > rules design as "street vendors" a mix of: > a) Newsagent kiosks and similar (ONCE kiosks). Most of them are permanent, > not dismantled at

Re: [Tagging] marking shop as street vendor

28. May 2018 13:46 by pla16...@gmail.com : > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 12:37 AM, Graeme Fitzpatrick <> graemefi...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > >> >> Would you tag the entire area eg >> >>

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

30. May 2018 00:31 by 61sundow...@gmail.com : > In that case I would tag > > intermittent=summer >   (...)   > The tags should 'make sense' without requiring further explanation... as > that generates these kind of problems. I

Re: [Tagging] RFC proposed water property key 'ephemeral '

30. May 2018 07:23 by osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au : > intermittent=summer > In summer: explicit state = intermittent > > Otherwise: default state = not present > I strongly oppose bolting on additional unclear values to tag where 99.99% values