I've now edited the coastline in the area mentioned. I have now added
natural=coastline along all the ways forming the edge of the mangroves and
open water.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62340975#map=13/-4.9075/137.1762
Further west, I moved the administrative boundary off of the
To me, waterway=* should only get values to map linear water courses for
the routable hydrographic network.
Newer tagging with natural=water sounds ok, except for artificial water
features.
I'm not so keen of natural=water over a man made irrigation canal, unless
there is no artificial water, even
Clarifying:
natural=water, water=river fits in with all other bodies of water mapped
as polygons.
Cheers
DaveF
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi
I would say yes, it is. It fits in with all other bodies of water mapped
as polygons. It makes it easier for renderers to do a general render for
all water features or be more specific for each type.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water
I swapped over when it was pointed out to
sent from a phone
> On 6. Sep 2018, at 15:37, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> well it is certainly the _older_ scheme than natural=water + water=river,
> insofar the statement is not wrong. The wiki page for 'riverbank' says, it
> "remains in widespread use and is still preferred by some mappers."
On 06.09.2018 15:15, yves wrote:
> Is waterway=riverbank an 'Old scheme' ?
That's what I read here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Driver
well it is certainly the _older_ scheme than natural=water + water=river, insofar the statement is
not wrong. The wiki page for
That's what I read here :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Driver
Regards,
Yves
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
I've just come back from three weeks vacation in the Sierra Nevada with
an RV. I've used turnouts there extensively. Mostly, they were long
enough to me not having to stop while I let the traffic pass. But there
were also the occasional ones (marked) that were just a 10m paved patch
next
On 05/09/2018 09:41, Warin wrote:
On 05/09/18 18:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
You can also “pass” an obstacle that stands still in English,
Close .. you may go past a house/school/shop. Not 'pass' a house/etc.
Sure you can. 'We passed the hospital on the way here' is perfectly good
I think of a lane added on the nearside (kerb side) of the road for slow
vehicles going uphill as a "crawler lane", and to me "passing place" is
meant for waiting for oncoming traffic to pass on a road too narrow for
two-way simultaneous use (and is typically short enough to represent with a
10 matches
Mail list logo
