sent from a phone
> On 6. Sep 2018, at 15:37, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org> wrote: > > well it is certainly the _older_ scheme than natural=water + water=river, > insofar the statement is not wrong. The wiki page for 'riverbank' says, it > "remains in widespread use and is still preferred by some mappers." I.e. 279K > vs. 19K for water=river. +1 according to tag history the older scheme grows at least at the same speed as the newer alternative. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
