Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (office=diplomatic)

Semicolon!  Sorry, my eyes are going bad!  Will fix.  Thanks, Graeme! apm On 11/17/2018 8:51 AM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 12:46, Allan Mustard > wrote: > > > Best regards to all, and please do not forget to vote! > > > Done! > > One

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (office=diplomatic)

On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 12:46, Allan Mustard wrote: > > Best regards to all, and please do not forget to vote! > Done! One possible (?) typo I noticed though, that may change meanings? Under target=* "or target =BE;EU:NATO

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (office=diplomatic)

Pursuant to a request from another mapper to wait another week after 10 November before calling for a vote, I postponed the start of voting on the office=diplomatic proposal to today.  Voting is now open.  Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/office%3Ddiplomatic for the

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

W dniu 17.11.2018 o 02:00, Christoph Hormann pisze: > On Saturday 17 November 2018, Daniel Koc4� wrote: >> The problem is that I have asked you how to draw verifiable node, >> [...] > No, you have not, you have asked: > >> It would be much more useful if you tell now how to verify position >> of

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

On Saturday 17 November 2018, Daniel Koc4� wrote: > > The problem is that I have asked you how to draw verifiable node, > [...] No, you have not, you have asked: > It would be much more useful if you tell now how to verify position > of this node? And i told you exactly that. We all know you

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:28 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > & I'll also add that if I'd done the amount of work that Daniel or Rober > had, then someone came along, said "I don't agree with the way you've done > that", & deleted it all, then I'd be extremely cheesed off! :-( > I'd find that

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

Following with interest (& I've got to say, that with my admittedly limited knowledge, that I agree with Dave, Kevin & Daniel's interpretation of how to do it). On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 09:48, Daniel Koć wrote: > > That is also why the coastline is never fully verifiable, but I would be > against

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

W dniu 16.11.2018 o 14:31, Christoph Hormann pisze: > Quoting from: Thanks, that was really helpful answer. The problem is that I have asked you how to draw verifiable node, not "what is a good practice for drawing a node using verifiable operations". Let's look closer: > in the middle

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

On Friday 16 November 2018, Daniel Koc4� wrote: > > It would be much more useful if you tell now how to verify position > of this node? Quoting from: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dstrait "when mapping as a node this node should usually best be placed approximately in the

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

W dniu 16.11.2018 o 12:24, Christoph Hormann pisze: > Yes, as already said i understand that and this is why i do not > primarily blame you or other mappers for using non-verifiable drawings > to map bays and straits but Daniel for incentivizing that for > ultimately selfish reasons. Using

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

On Thursday 15 November 2018, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > > > Data of subjective value for a specific application (like low > > quality label rendering) - yes, obviously. Meaningful additional > > information about the verifiable geography - no, i don't think so. > > By 'low quality', I presume you

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

That node too was left behind by mistake. I just now deleted it. The problem with using a way is that I can't see it. And I bet most current map products can't render it either. That someone with special cartographic skills can render it is good to know but it doesn't really help my situation. If

Re: [Tagging] Neighborhood Gateway Signs?

Am Fr., 16. Nov. 2018 um 02:48 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg < joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>: > Here in Indonesia it is very common for neighbors to build sign over > the main entrance to their neighborhood, with the name of the > neighborhood on top and some other info on the two columns supporting

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

On Friday 16 November 2018, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > To answer Christoph's question about Chickaloon Bay and the node for > the same bay, I simply forgot to delete the redundant node after I > finished. Interestingly, the label for the new multipolygon fell only > slightly to the east of the node