thank you for the references to the specific standards. I’m going to look more
into it. Problem is if these are hundreds of pages most people will not look
the tags up ;-)
sent from a phone
On 7. Dec 2018, at 05:30, Michael Patrick wrote:
>> FWIW, with regard to dictionaries, in the case
Do they not have grade eight roofers in the US?
7.12.2018 01:38 tarihinde Michael Patrick yazdı:
>
> great you name carpenters, because there were actually some
> problems in the
> past classifying people working with wood. ... Can you explain the
> difference between a framer, a
On 06/12/2018 20:49, Mark Wagner wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:54:44 +0100 Rory McCann wrote:
natural=tree? natural=petrified_tree ?
"Tree" is misleading. "natural=petrified_tree" would be good, except
it gets zero hits in TagInfo.
Nothing wrong with being the first use of a tag.
*
W dniu 07.12.2018 o 12:23, Christoph Hormann pisze:
> The changes i refer to with my comment are in particular the
> inflationary addition of new POI symbols many of which have been chosen
> without considering the applicability to represent the feature type in
> question across different
Of these two, “designation=*” is the best option, because it would be the
same key in all countries.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 6:50 PM Eugene Podshivalov
wrote:
> I assume that the aforementioned issue with the official classification of
> settlement being deferent from the place tags values is
On Friday 07 December 2018, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > We have however many other tags where OSM-Carto recently added or
> > changed rendering in ways that provide mapping incentives agaist
> > the established meaning of the tags.
>
> Can you link issues opened on issue tracker that
> report
I assume that the aforementioned issue with the official classification of
settlement being deferent from the place tags values is faced in many
countries.
So some common approach is needed here. There were many solutioned listed
above, but it seems that only the following two are suitable for
