Re: [Tagging] Residential=rural, =urban?

2019-04-10 10:28 a écrit Joseph Eisenberg: [...] Does anyone feel like doing some research into how these tags is actually used, so that the wiki page can match? Or has anyone used this tag themselves? I took a quick look in Sweden. There are only a few hundred of them (369, to be exact, in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Subkey camp_pitch:*

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 12:32, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > As requested, I've moved the subkeys for camp_pitch:*= to their own > proposal page: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:camp_pitch Sorry Joseph, & apologies if I missed an earlier part of the discussion, but

Re: [Tagging] tags for a live stock sale yard

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 13:58, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any suggestions fora live stock sale yard? > > Not a farm. Don't really like landuse=commercial. > I put one in as building=industrial with description Stock Sales Yard as I couldn't find anything better :-(

[Tagging] tags for a live stock sale yard

Any suggestions fora live stock sale yard? Not a farm. Don't really like landuse=commercial. Way 532692207 is one. It really is associated with agriculture... ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Subkey camp_pitch:*

As requested, I've moved the subkeys for camp_pitch:*= to their own proposal page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:camp_pitch This page now includes the 9 namespaced keys that were created in 2015 as part of the original Camp Site Pitch proposal. These are intended to be

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

Tod, I have already updated the Key:camp_site page with a longer description of this tag, camp_site=camp_pitch tag, because it is the most common value of camp_site=*. The reasons for the proposal instead of just making a wiki page: 1) To clarify that camp_site=pitch (1500 uses) should be changed

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

> On Apr 10, 2019, at 12:02 AM, Joseph Eisenberg > wrote: > > I've restarted the proposal process for camp_site=camp_pitch > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch > > > This tag has

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Key:golf_cart

I think “access=yes” and “motor_vehicle=yes” are the assumed default access values for highway=residential, so golf_cart=yes is probably the only access tag needed in that example On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 7:49 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 22:30, Paul Allen wrote: >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Key:golf_cart

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 22:30, Paul Allen wrote: > You may want to take Peachtree City, Georgia into account in your > proposal. It has an > alternative transportation network of golf cart paths. People must obtain > and display permits > on their carts to use the paths. > I know of a couple

Re: [Tagging] Residential=rural, =urban?

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 18:29, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > There is a page for residential=rural created in July 2015 without a > proposal. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:residential%3Drural=history > > The page says: "residential=rural is a subtag of landuse=residential >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- Landcover Cultivated

On Wednesday 10 April 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > [...] > > But in this case I am even more confused - with low quality images > how one is supposed to distinguish forest from orchards/plantations? Indeed. I don't see a lot of practical cases where you can reliably distinguish between

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- Landcover Cultivated

This group of proposals seems to be intended for using OpenStreetMap as place to vectorize low quality aerial/satellite images. I am against using OSM for its purpose at it makes proper mapping more confusing. This applies to all three proposals from this group. But in this case I am even more

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- Landcover Artificial

As expressed in earlier discussion I see little value in such unspecific value. It will be more confusing to mappers and this data will not help in further mapping. I have similar opinion about two other related proposals. Apr 6, 2019, 11:46 AM by lorenzostucch...@outlook.it: > Dear all, > >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

I mean tourism=camp_site, sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:51 PM Joseph Eisenberg < joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > The current proposal suggests that this is useful to define individual > sites for tents or caravans within a larger leisure=camp_site area. > > I don’t see

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

The current proposal suggests that this is useful to define individual sites for tents or caravans within a larger leisure=camp_site area. I don’t see much use in double tagging a single backcountry tent site with leisure=camp_site and camp_site=camp_pitch on the same node. Usually an individual

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Key:golf_cart

Sure, all of the usual access values can be used, including golf_cart=permissive (for paths on private land that currently allow public access), golf_cart=customers (for parking lots) and golf_cart=private (access is for residents of a gated community only, for example). There are a handful of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

It mostly looks good, avoiding the over-namespacing of at least one of the earlier proposals. Should we consider clarifying that isolated sites that support only a single party may/may not be tagged with camp_pitch? I'm comfortable with either: in one interpretation, a camp_pitch is simply a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Key:golf_cart

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 13:28, Paul Allen wrote: [Replying to myself because I'm getting forgetful in my old age.] One of the golf cart paths on OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62097657#map=17/33.38928/-84.59475 -- Paul ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Key:golf_cart

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 00:22, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > Please comment: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:golf_cart > You may want to take Peachtree City, Georgia into account in your proposal. It has an alternative transportation network of golf cart paths. People

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 09:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > I've restarted the proposal process for camp_site=camp_pitch > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch Looks good, thank you! Regards Markus ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- Voting result -- shop=fashion_accessories

Hi, On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 09:52, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > thank you, could you please link the proposal from the feature page? The proposal is already linked from the data item Q19528 [1] and is passed on to the {{ValueDescription}} template on the feature page. There should be a sheet

Re: [Tagging] Residential=rural, =urban?

On 10/04/19 18:28, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: There is a page for residential=rural created in July 2015 without a proposal. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:residential%3Drural=history The page says: "residential=rural is a subtag of landuse=residential and is used to specify

[Tagging] Residential=rural, =urban?

There is a page for residential=rural created in July 2015 without a proposal. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:residential%3Drural=history The page says: "residential=rural is a subtag of landuse=residential and is used to specify residential areas with low-rise residential

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- Voting result -- shop=fashion_accessories

sent from a phone > On 10. Apr 2019, at 09:31, Markus wrote: > > Feature page: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfashion_accessories thank you, could you please link the proposal from the feature page? Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- Voting result -- shop=fashion_accessories

Hello everyone, The proposal for shop=fashion_accessories has been approved with 20 votes for and 1 vote against. Many thanks for your support! Feature page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfashion_accessories Data item: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q19528 Regards

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

I've restarted the proposal process for camp_site=camp_pitch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch This tag has already been used over 6800 times by over 380 mappers and is pretty well defined by the old proposal page from 2015 as an individual tent or caravan