I'm thinking more along the lines of:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_(communication_protocol)#Bridges
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friendica#Features
But we're still missing a few. It would be best if we had a single
unified platform (or one for realtime, and one for non-realtime use
cases).
The idea of providing a matrix (or mattermost or ...) instance for the
OSM community has been floating around for a long time, but on the one
hand it would require somebody willing to to the sysadmin work for it,
and somebody would need to do some work on integrating OSM
authentication (as I side
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 02:02, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
Aircraft too can have an external electrical power connection.
>
Aircraft power is rather specialized. Three phase 115 VAC @ 400 Hz and/or
28 VDC
(14 VDC for some light aircraft). The connectors are rather specialized
too. More
Le dim. 23 juin 2019 à 13:49, Paul Allen a écrit :
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 02:02, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Aircraft too can have an external electrical power connection.
>>
>
> Aircraft power is rather specialized.
>
Like any power supply.
Being different from domestic power doe
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 13:01, François Lacombe
wrote:
>
> Le dim. 23 juin 2019 à 13:49, Paul Allen a écrit :
>
>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 02:02, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Aircraft too can have an external electrical power connection.
>>>
>>
>> Aircraft power is rather specialized
Am 23. Juni 2019 14:16:43 MESZ schrieb Paul Allen :
>Mapping a GPU would be like mapping a tractor on a farm. It's not
>sensible
>because it moves.
Wouldn't it make sense then to tag it with the airport or airstrip and indicate
the connector/voltage/etc for the entire facility?
__
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 13:40, François Lacombe
wrote:
>
> Le dim. 23 juin 2019 à 14:20, Paul Allen a écrit :
>
>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 13:01, François Lacombe
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Le dim. 23 juin 2019 à 13:49, Paul Allen a écrit :
>>>
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 02:02, Warin <61sundow...@gma
Thanks for answer
Le dim. 23 juin 2019 à 14:20, Paul Allen a écrit :
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 13:01, François Lacombe
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Le dim. 23 juin 2019 à 13:49, Paul Allen a écrit :
>>
>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 02:02, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Aircraft too can have an e
I thought this was an easy case for my first proposal. Now I'm faced with with
comments in the wiki that suggest marking two tags as deprecated (one used over
3 times) and creating a complex tagging systems that includes all places
where electrical power can be obtained...
Am Sa., Juni
Note that you sure not obligated to follow
all suggestions.
Usually at least some suggestions are
contradictory or without support or
harmful.
23 cze 2019, 17:06 od tagging@openstreetmap.org:
> I thought this was an easy case for my first proposal. Now I'm faced with
> with comments in the wiki
On Sat, 2019-06-22 at 01:23 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 at 23:56, Graeme Fitzpatrick <
> graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 at 04:53, Paul Allen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Having power_supply=yes indicates that the socket type is
> > > unknown,
> >
> > But wouldn
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 18:26, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On camp sites in the UK and France the hook-up is a CEE 17 blue
> single-phase in my experience.
>
I think that's what the UK wiring regs mandate for new installations. And
have done for many years.
But there may be older installations offer
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 5:49 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
> Joseph Eisenberg writes:
>
> > This requirement is fine for Europe, but the presence of lane markings
> > is not reliable in all of the world.
> >
> > In developing countries, such as here in Indonesia, the presence of
> > painted lane marking
sent from a phone
> Am 21.06.2019 um 21:15 schrieb François Lacombe :
>
> It's more fun to use socket=* than power_supply:socket_type=* since the only
> important word is "socket".
> Power_supply comes in another tag and _type doesn't bring any additionnal
> information.
+1
Cheers, Martin
Without digging deeply into width, presumably it measured in meters ? I can
see value there, but the width has to be an average, and the cleared area
for passage of vehicles.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 3:12 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 5:49 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> Joseph
The width default unit is metres, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units for other units
and how to state them.
For a road I would tag the minimum width - so any vehicle entering can
pass along the entire length and not get stuck.
On 24/06/19 07:56, Nita S. wrote:
Witho
On 24/06/19 01:06, Michael Brandtner via Tagging wrote:
I thought this was an easy case for my first proposal.
Not easy, is it.
From a restricted point of view most things appear easy. It is only
when a wider view is had that difficulties might be seen.
And then once other mappers start to use
Paul Johnson writes:
> In that example, I think it'd be better to just tag width=* instead of
> lanes=*.
Perhaps, but then data consumers have to figure how how many cars are
supposed to be side by side. That number really is local convention;
one road I use is really not wide enough for 2, bu
That so doesn't work in the real world, though. Residential streets are
typically about 35 feet wide curb to curb. Is this lanes=4 or lanes=2?
Trick question, it's neither because parking is allowed on the curb on both
sides and the middle portion isn't wide enough to allow to cars to pass
side t
19 matches
Mail list logo
