Le 07.10.19 à 23:07, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> let’s bury the contact: - prefix
in this case, be logical and also propose to bury the prefix addr:
on the contrary, I believe that having a namespace to group the keys
concerning the addr and another namespace to group the keys concerning
th
Considering the responses it may be better to give a more definite criteria
for using this tag.
In this regard the definition of leisure=sunbathing as *any* popular place
suitable for sunbathing looks rather vague. It could be more easily also
used as a trolltag.
So, how is about using leisure=su
Re: “if you want to display a tab with all the means of contact, you just
have to look for contact:”
That doesn’t work, because “phone=“ is much more popular and probably
always will be, and the “contact:” prefix is not used terrible
consistently (is a website actually a way to contact a feature?
On 08/10/2019 12:14, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Re: “if you want to display a tab with all the means of contact, you
just have to look for contact:”
That doesn’t work, because “phone=“ is much more popular and probably
always will be, and the “contact:” prefix is not used terrible
consistently
A short summary of what we have so far:- Deprecation of `contact:phone` has some advantages: Key `phone` is used far more often, Key `phone` is shorter to write and better to find in word completion functions of editors like iD, Data users don't have to support two methods of tagging phone numbers.
One could find two different schemes are used for this across the OSM:
#1. The most popular way is to tag the nodes with railway=crossing
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dcrossing). There are
currently *35151* nodes like this around the world
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/MVO.
It
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 22:08, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
not to speak about addr:housenumber and addr:housename (the latter is
> mostly useless
>
In some areas of the UK I've lived, all houses have numbers and a few also
have names
(which are viewed by many as an affectation). In rural districts
On 2019-10-08 13:25, Valor Naram wrote:
> A short summary of what we have so far:
> - Deprecation of `contact:phone` has some advantages: Key `phone` is used far
> more often, Key `phone` is shorter to write and better to find in word
> completion functions of editors like iD, Data users don't h
8 Oct 2019, 11:25 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com:
> Le 07.10.19 à 23:07, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
>
>> let’s bury the contact: - prefix
>>
>
> in this case, be logical and also propose to bury the prefix addr:
>
Main difference is that contact: prefix has
an alternative that is and always wa
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, 11:29 marc marc, wrote:
> Le 07.10.19 à 23:07, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> > let’s bury the contact: - prefix
>
> in this case, be logical and also propose to bury the prefix addr:
>
There's a difference between the two prefixes: several addr: tags together
form a complet
Hi Vɑdɪm
I don't know the situation in other countries, but in Switzerland,
pedestrian train crossing are signalised (example [1]), while
pedestrian tram crossings usually aren't (example [2]), even if the
tram runs on a reserved track (i.e. separated form the road). Thus i
think it may make sense
sent from a phone
> On 8. Oct 2019, at 15:14, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Housename may be useless where you live but for some of us it is essential.
yes , of course, sorry for stepping on your toes, I was being sarcastic to
better make the point, but I am aware that there is some use for this (e
sent from a phone
> On 8. Oct 2019, at 15:40, Colin Smale via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> In that case it makes perfect sense to consolidate onto one or the other. But
> if there are any perceived semantic differences, however subtle, then either
> we find some way to represent that using other ta
`contact:phone` and `phone` are exactly for the same purpose, no differences just different names.See https://wiki.osm.org/Key:contact~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Phone)From: Martin Koppenhoefer To: "Tag discuss
On 2019-10-08 21:51, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> On 8. Oct 2019, at 15:40, Colin Smale via Tagging
> wrote:
>
>> In that case it makes perfect sense to consolidate onto one or the other.
>> But if there are any perceived semantic differences, however subtle, then
>> either we find some way
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 20:49, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> yes , of course, sorry for stepping on your toes, I was being sarcastic to
> better make the point, but I am aware that there is some use for this (even
> around here it may occur that a house has a name but not a number).
>
Not normall
Hi there fellow OSMers,
What's the best way to tag an Irish pub? Not just a pub in Ireland, but
a specifically themed "Irish Pub" (which are usually outside Ireland)?
There's ~300 instances of `cuisine=irish`, which would make total sense
for places which (also) serve food. Traditionally pubs in
On 10/8/2019 4:37 PM, Rory McCann wrote:
What's the best way to tag an Irish pub? Not just a pub in Ireland, but
a specifically themed "Irish Pub" (which are usually outside Ireland)?
There's ~300 instances of `cuisine=irish`, which would make total sense
for places which (also) serve food. Trad
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 08:06, Jmapb wrote:
> On 10/8/2019 4:37 PM, Rory McCann wrote:
>
> What's the best way to tag an Irish pub? Not just a pub in Ireland, but
> a specifically themed "Irish Pub" (which are usually outside Ireland)?
>
> I think the idea of `theme=irish` makes some sense, and in
On 10/8/2019 6:20 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
I was wondering about the same thing, because you've then also got
Country & Western, German, any & all varieties of Gay ... ?
Bit of an awkward one, but there are pub's in Northern & Inland
Australia that white people are NOT welcome in (& I'm a
On 09/10/19 09:45, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
On 10/8/2019 6:20 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
I was wondering about the same thing, because you've then also got
Country & Western, German, any & all varieties of Gay ... ?
Bit of an awkward one, but there are pub's in Northern & Inland
Austra
sent from a phone
> On 8. Oct 2019, at 22:08, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> So the subtlety you are referring to, is that some phone numbers routinely
> connect to a recording instead of a human.
>
> How about phone:recorded_message=* which would leave room for phone=* for a
> manned line, or rec
On 08/10/19 20:27, Vɑdɪm wrote:
Considering the responses it may be better to give a more definite criteria
for using this tag.
In this regard the definition of leisure=sunbathing as *any* popular place
suitable for sunbathing looks rather vague. It could be more easily also
used as a trolltag.
sent from a phone
On 9. Oct 2019, at 01:02, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Other common themes are Polynesian (tiki bar), speakeasy, surfing,
>> medical... plenty more out there I imagine. There's one bar in NYC that's
>> themed around smashing appliances with bats.
> theme=* could w
On 07/10/19 21:00, Valor Naram wrote:
> One problem with enforcing a single tag by mappers or preprocessing
> data before putting it in the database is that if there are subtle
distinctions they are
> forever lost.
Sven gave us a list of tags which have exact meaning. So no
distinctions. No d
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 00:36, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> the way we are dealing with these distinctions of eating and drinking
> places is mostly main tags, and subtags only for subtleties. A tiki bar
> could get amenity=bar, or maybe I’m misguided (I’m not familiar with the
> kind of place)?
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 08:46, Jmapb via Tagging
wrote:
> On 10/8/2019 6:20 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Bit of an awkward one, but there are pub's in Northern & Inland Australia
> that white people are NOT welcome in (& I'm absolutely certain that the
> same thing, & reverse, applies in many
After reading all the responses and comments made regarding this issue I would
like to modify the originally proposed tag name ('addr=milestone’) to a new
proposal to name it: ‘addr=road_marker’ - which works for both the kilometer
and mile highway location markers.
The next step will be to pr
On 09/10/19 12:11, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 08:46, Jmapb via Tagging
mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
On 10/8/2019 6:20 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Bit of an awkward one, but there are pub's in Northern & Inland
Australia that white people are
sent from a phone
> On 9. Oct 2019, at 03:24, Jorge Aguirre wrote:
>
> After reading all the responses and comments made regarding this issue I
> would like to modify the originally proposed tag name ('addr=milestone’) to a
> new proposal to name it: ‘addr=road_marker’ - which works for bot
30 matches
Mail list logo
