On 14/10/19 07:26, Volker Schmidt wrote:
(disclosure: I am academic member, but express my personal view)
The Great Divide route is, to my knowledge, not signposted. The source
for thr route is most likely either a GPX track from ACA or a map set
from ACA, which has their copyright on it. aca
(disclosure: I am academic member, but express my personal view)
The Great Divide route is, to my knowledge, not signposted. The source for
thr route is most likely either a GPX track from ACA or a map set from
ACA, which has their copyright on it. aca sells the GPX track and the map.
For these
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 20:30, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Edit the source, to vote, and you'll see there's a bit of a mess:
>
> {{Template:Proposed feature voting}} {{vote|yes}}
> --[[User:Eric Bie|Eric B.]] ([[User talk:Eric Bie|talk]]) 15:03, 12 October
> 2019 (UTC)
It was a visual edit that added
I'm in favor of being flexible for cycling routes. A good example is
the great divide mtb route in Canada & US. It is probably not signed
very well, if at all. It was created by a non-profit & I don't think
it is an official government route. It is used by quite a few people,
both on
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 19:17, François Lacombe
wrote:
>
> I don't understand what do you mean exactly
> Voting options are a template, and not visible on source
>
Look at the votes so far. The first vote is out of position and looks like
this:
{{vote|yes}} --Eric B.
Hi Graeme
I don't understand what do you mean exactly
Voting options are a template, and not visible on source
What is the expected behaviour you think about?
All the best
François
Le dim. 13 oct. 2019 à 02:13, Graeme Fitzpatrick a
écrit :
> Just letting you know that something has happened
Richard Fairhurst wrote
> There is no need to have railway=crossing, railway=level_crossing,
> railway=tram_crossing and railway=tram_level_crossing. They are
> semantically
> identical. The type of ways (tram or heavy rail, footpath or road) is
> already expressed in the way tags and doesn't need
Hi
I started the vote on Toy Library proposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/toy_library
There was only one comment after the RFC which I added to the proposal,
which asked for a subtag to identify toy libraries that focus on toys for
people with disabilities.
The vote
