Richard Fairhurst wrote > There is no need to have railway=crossing, railway=level_crossing, > railway=tram_crossing and railway=tram_level_crossing. They are > semantically > identical. The type of ways (tram or heavy rail, footpath or road) is > already expressed in the way tags and doesn't need to be duplicated in the > node tags. > > Let's just standardise on the simplest tag, railway=crossing, and nuke the > others.
Actually for me it looks quite logic. At the list one could find a couple of topics on this matter. http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Why-the-difference-between-railway-crossing-and-level-crossing-tt5261037.html http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Why-are-railway-crossing-and-level-crossing-separate-tags-tt5258808.html On the other hand railway=crossing vs railway=level_crossing are at least documented at the OSM wiki. Perhaps it's worth to sort out the incorrect ones first. -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
