sent from a phone
> On 22. Dec 2019, at 16:43, Peter Elderson wrote:
>
> A linear walking route marked in both directions is not a roundtrip. You're
> not guided to turn around at the end and return to the start.
there are cases where it’s unavoidable, because there is only one way.
Cheers
Hello,
I would like to find a good tag for the case in subject.
In particular I'm referring to mandatory courses that workers must to take
part (like security on workplace) after they start a new job.
The goal of the company is to release a certification after the subscriber
reaches the minimum am
The tag landuse=churchyard has been used several thousand times, but
amenity=graveyard is over 10 times more common, and landuse=religious
is 4 times more common.
I would recommend discouraging use of this tag, because the wiki
definition contradicts the plain-English meaning of churchyard, which
small_electric_vehicle for segways and electric kick scooters seems
confusing to me: I would imagine this including electric golf carts
(already tagged golf_cart=yes/designated/no) and perhaps other things.
It’s also a bit odd that electric pedal-assist bicycles with limited top
speed are to be ta
Good point. I would say roundtrip is the service provided. But if a route
is designed for roundtrip service i.e. if you remain seated you end up at
the starting point, roundtrip becomes an attribute of the route. However,
most PT allows you to book or perform a roundtrip. Because even if you get
of
PL
W dniu 19-12-14 o 03:14, Warin pisze:
> Jeśli tag jest w języku angielskim, powinien być również w nazwie: en
> = *. Jeśli jest w innym języku, powinien być również w nazwie: język =
> * gdzie język jest nazwą tego języka.
> Tagi Wikipedii powinny zawierać odpowiedni język ..
>> kontynentó
>
> If following the route marking you will get back to start... It's a circular
> route.
> As previously stated you could find marking on both directions and be a
> single line straight and then reverse.
> With old wiki definition this is Roundtrip=no... Now it is Roundtrip=yes
> Seems sane to
3 240 (10%) objects with rountrip=3 also have public_transport:version=*
ex https://www.ratp.fr/plans-lignes/noctilien/n01
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1083331
Le 22.12.19 à 11:57, Peter Elderson a écrit :
> For PT, roundtrip is not an attribute of the route
>
>> Op 21 dec. 2019 om 15:3
Taking the various comments and suggestions into account,
I revised some of the tags proposed and also included electric mopeds
in the proposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ElectricBicyclesAndScooters
The current set of tags is:
* electric_bicycle - bicycles with mo
Il dom 22 dic 2019, 11:59 Peter Elderson ha scritto:
> For PT, roundtrip is not an attribute of the route, it's a type of ticket
> or it's what you use the transport for. You can do a roundtrip on a
> circular line, but also on non-circular lines or mostly non-circular with a
> loop at the end, w
For PT, roundtrip is not an attribute of the route, it's a type of ticket or
it's what you use the transport for. You can do a roundtrip on a circular line,
but also on non-circular lines or mostly non-circular with a loop at the end,
whatever. To express that a PT route is circular, I think the
sent from a phone
> On 22. Dec 2019, at 01:24, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Do highway=trunk in German always have a physical barrier such a kerb
> to separate the two directions, even if they are not a dual
> carriageway?
road
>
> The English highway=trunk page says this about Germany
12 matches
Mail list logo
