Feb 27, 2020, 00:22 by joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com:
> Different tags are used for petroleum wells vs water wells because
> they look totally different and their function for the general map
> user is quite distinct. A water well might just be a covered hole, but
> if it is a bored (drilled)
On Thu, 27 Feb. 2020, 08:22 Martin Koppenhoefer,
wrote:
>
> can you explain with the amended rules what the outcome would be for
>
> 8 votes yes, 0 no, 1 abstention
>
That is 8 unanimous approval votes so it is passed.
8 votes yes, 1 no, 1 abstention
Didn't reach the required quorum of 10
JOSM doesn't change seem to change the order when it sorts, if the
relation is already listed "backwards" but in an ordered string. It
also won't sort a waterway relation which includes sidestream members,
or gaps.
But if you sort an unsorted waterway and each of the ways can be put
into one
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, 13:48 Joseph Eisenberg,
wrote:
> When you make or sort a relation of type=waterway, do you check if the
> source or mouth of the river is first on the list of ways?
>
As the ways point in the direction of flow I would have said that source to
sink was the natural sorting
> 1. How do I change the name of the proposal page to better match what was
> voted ?
That's not necessary. It's fine to keep the proposal name as it is.
> 2. How do I create the permanent feature page ?
Login to the wiki, then go to
When you make or sort a relation of type=waterway, do you check if the
source or mouth of the river is first on the list of ways?
Another user just suggested that the spring/source of the waterway
should start the list, then the mouth of the river at the ocean (or
where it empties into a larger
> Christmas trees are intended to regulate the well pressure or manage filling
> product injection to raise field pressure.
> You'll find them independently on oil or water wells depending on the
> pressure.
Very few water wells have high enough pressure to require such a
device. 99.9% of water
Hi
Le jeu. 27 févr. 2020 à 00:23, Joseph Eisenberg
a écrit :
> Different tags are used for petroleum wells vs water wells because
> they look totally different and their function for the general map
> user is quite distinct. A water well might just be a covered hole, but
> if it is a bored
Different tags are used for petroleum wells vs water wells because
they look totally different and their function for the general map
user is quite distinct. A water well might just be a covered hole, but
if it is a bored (drilled) well it will be connected to a manual or
powered pump.
An oil or
On 2/26/2020 4:59 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
It's also possible to have a functioning petroleum well without any notable
surface-level equipment
So in that case, there would be no "pumping rig", right? There would
just be some pipes and valves the the wellhead, aka a "Christmas
tree":
Note that "adding no vote may
turn failing vote into a passing vote"
is a separate issue.
26 Feb 2020, 22:21 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 26. Feb 2020, at 09:15, Joseph Eisenberg
>> wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone else want to add their comments or votes there? This
> It's also possible to have a functioning petroleum well without any
notable surface-level equipment
So in that case, there would be no "pumping rig", right? There would
just be some pipes and valves the the wellhead, aka a "Christmas
tree": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellhead and
sent from a phone
> On 26. Feb 2020, at 08:56, Markus Peloso wrote:
>
> The amenity=give_box tag is specific for sharing and reusing none food items.
> Please do not use it for food sharing
+1, although these are somehow similar features from a certain point of view,
they are also
sent from a phone
> On 26. Feb 2020, at 09:15, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Does anyone else want to add their comments or votes there? This seems
> to be a rough consensus now.
can you explain with the amended rules what the outcome would be for
8 votes yes, 0 no, 1 abstention
8
Le mer. 26 févr. 2020 à 22:06, Martin Koppenhoefer
a écrit :
>
> these aren’t independent concepts, a water well works differently than a
> gas well. The substance (and its intended use, and the intended quantity)
> define/s the requirements for the well.
>
We both agree on the sense.
I meant
sent from a phone
> On 26. Feb 2020, at 09:15, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> After 2 weeks, the discussion at Talk:Proposal_process shows 10 people
> in favor of considering an abstention the same as not voting, except
> for the quorum, and 1 opposed:
>
sent from a phone
> On 26. Feb 2020, at 21:32, François Lacombe wrote:
>
> Nevertheess, should we take advantage of this discussion to use man_made=well
> + substance=* only as to prevent usage of values mixing two independant
> concepts (the well and the substance)?
these aren’t
Hi all,
Le mer. 26 févr. 2020 à 20:55, Martin Koppenhoefer
a écrit :
>
> thank you for bringing this up. I just noticed you have added a
> deprecation note on
>
> man_made=gas_well
>
> and suggest to use man_made=petroleum_well for gas wells.
>
sent from a phone
> On 26. Feb 2020, at 09:56, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> man_made=petroleum_well
thank you for bringing this up. I just noticed you have added a deprecation
note on
man_made=gas_well
and suggest to use man_made=petroleum_well for gas wells.
On 2/26/2020 3:54 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
There are some users on the wiki who seem to treat these two tags as
near-synonyms
man_made=petroleum_well
man_made=pumping_rig
The later was approved, but the first is much more common.
The proposal in 2008 for pumping_rig said
"A tag for
Thanks, Markus, for your feedback.
I agree with you, network fit better then brand.
I remove charity I think it is not usefull because it do not fit. The little
free pantry is more about food for people in need. My intention was to document
this with charity=yes.
Best regards
Markus aka
Hello,
Since no one has manifested an objection (still not too late), I am going
to amend the final voted tag pair to :
drinking_water:refill=yes/drinking_water:refill=no
drinking_water:refill:network=network-name1;network-name2;network-name3;
Can someone please guide me on the below. I
Thanks, Markus, for writing this proposal. I like the proposed tag.
Just two minor things regarding tags that can be used in combination:
- brand=* Optional. Name of the brand or network of the facility if
there is one visible. eg.
I would change this to network=* as it seems to fit better.
On Wednesday, 26 February 2020, Marc Gemis wrote:
> What about music festivals? I live close to the area that hosts one of
> the biggest festivals in the world: Tomorrowland. [1]
> The festival takes place in a former quarry, which is a park for the
> rest of the year, although it hosts some
There are some users on the wiki who seem to treat these two tags as
near-synonyms
man_made=petroleum_well
man_made=pumping_rig
The later was approved, but the first is much more common.
The proposal in 2008 for pumping_rig said
"A tag for pumping platforms - gas, oil, etc. The rig may be on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/food_sharing
«A shelf/box/fridge where people drop off and pick up food in the sense of free
sharing and/or to reduce food waste.»
Hi
I added the current proposal for food sharing I made to the wiki.
What do you think about it?
Best
What about music festivals? I live close to the area that hosts one of
the biggest festivals in the world: Tomorrowland. [1]
The festival takes place in a former quarry, which is a park for the
rest of the year, although it hosts some smaller yearly events as
well.
The festival started as a
After 2 weeks, the discussion at Talk:Proposal_process shows 10 people
in favor of considering an abstention the same as not voting, except
for the quorum, and 1 opposed:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposal_process#Clarify_whatever_explicit_abstaining_is_the_same_as_no_vote
"In
28 matches
Mail list logo
