Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Phake Nick
在 2020年5月10日週日 07:08,François Lacombe 寫道: > > Le sam. 9 mai 2020 à 19:20, Phake Nick a écrit : > >> >> What you said doesn't make sense. >> The existence of a space within the word doesn't inherently make them >> separateable. >> Like for the tag amenity=charging_station, do you think the space

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 19:33, Paul Allen wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2020 at 00:25, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: >> imagine you are ordering a taxi for yourself and 2 colleagues to the airport >> and instead of a taxi (cab) they send you 3 taxi moto. Would that be equally >> ok, wouldn’t it

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Paul Allen
On Sun, 10 May 2020 at 00:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > imagine you are ordering a taxi for yourself and 2 colleagues to the > airport and instead of a taxi (cab) they send you 3 taxi moto. Would that > be equally ok, wouldn’t it matter, taxi is taxi? > It would matter a hell of a lot if

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Paul Allen
On Sun, 10 May 2020 at 00:08, François Lacombe wrote: > Finally, Paul, I find your point about taxonomy thinking interesting and > will try to develop it a bit in future. > I'm starting to wonder if the taxonomy adopted is influenced by the language of the person doing the classifying. If

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 9. May 2020, at 22:50, Florimond Berthoux > wrote: > > Yeah, that's the point... > > Keep it simple. > You know taxi key ? You know motorcycle key ? Yeah, you can contribute > without checking yet another wiki tag page. > > By the way, this how a taxi moto looks

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread François Lacombe
Le sam. 9 mai 2020 à 19:20, Phake Nick a écrit : > > What you said doesn't make sense. > The existence of a space within the word doesn't inherently make them > separateable. > Like for the tag amenity=charging_station, do you think the space mean ot > make sense to change the tagging scheme

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Phake Nick
Key chaining is the more complex form of representation, especially when there are no obvious relationship between different types of objects being represented. 在 2020年5月10日週日 04:50,Florimond Berthoux 寫道: > Yeah, that's the point... > > Keep it simple. > You know taxi key ? You know motorcycle

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Florimond Berthoux
Yeah, that's the point... Keep it simple. You know taxi key ? You know motorcycle key ? Yeah, you can contribute without checking yet another wiki tag page. By the way, this how a taxi moto looks like in Paris https://www.city-bird.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DSC3972_R1_optimise_bas.jpg Le

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
May 9, 2020, 14:33 by fl.infosrese...@gmail.com: > Le sam. 9 mai 2020 à 02:29, Paul Allen <> pla16...@gmail.com> > a écrit : >   > >> Motorcycle taxi is different from 4-wheeled taxi because they provide a >> different experience with different speed, charge different fare, have >> different

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Phake Nick
在 2020年5月9日週六 20:35,François Lacombe 寫道: > Hi Paul, > > Le sam. 9 mai 2020 à 02:29, Paul Allen a écrit : > >> >> This isn't just about optimizing the number of tags used, it's about >> aligning with >> how most people's mental models work. And not just the mental models >> of local mappers but

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 13:35, François Lacombe wrote: > > Tourists aren't supposed to refer to tags to know which kind of taxi > service they can use. > But the query tool is there. Or are you proposing banning tourists from using it? That would be possible - login required to use the query

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Paul, Le sam. 9 mai 2020 à 02:29, Paul Allen a écrit : > > This isn't just about optimizing the number of tags used, it's about > aligning with > how most people's mental models work. And not just the mental models > of local mappers but also the mental models of tourists: locals don't

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - traffic_signals=crossing_only

2020-05-09 Thread Lukas-458
Hi, in a discussion during voting on my proposal of traffic_signals=crossing_only (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/traffic_signals%3Dcrossing_only) there was mentioned that the existing values of traffic_signals=* partial rather describe the configuration of a traffic

Re: [Tagging] RFC ele:regional

2020-05-09 Thread Simon Poole
I was just making a statement of fact, not arguing one way or the other. The original reason for using HAE in the ele tag was exactly what Kevin claimed what would be the only sensible use of the HAE value. That it probably was a bad idea because it didn't take the realities of mapping in to

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-09 Thread Phake Nick
在 2020年5月9日週六 07:07,François Lacombe 寫道: > Hi > > Le ven. 8 mai 2020 à 20:48, Phake Nick a écrit : > >> motorcycle are not the same type of service as regular taxi. >> > > Then may I ask you why ? > I pay a driver to take me where I want to with his vehicle. > "I pay a driver to take me where