Re: [Tagging] Education reform - a minor change on my proposal

On 6/6/20 9:04 pm, Erkin Alp Güney wrote: I have changed how buildings in the campus should be tagged. Some suggestions? Just use 'outer boundary' rath

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

On 7/6/20 1:31 am, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 at 11:23, Andy Townsend wrote: On 06/06/2020 16:18, Phake Nick wrote: 在 2020年6月6日週六 11:03，Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> 寫道： As a general tourist I would have no interest in traveling along a railway route here nothing remains of the

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

On 7/6/20 1:52 am, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 6. Jun 2020, at 03:58, Jack Armstrong wrote: The wiki permits the mapping of reality, on-the-ground, as it is in the world today. OSM should reflect what exists today, not decades ago. If there is something that remains o

Re: [Tagging] Reviving the path discussion - the increasing, importance of trails in OSM

On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 09:20:43AM +1000, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 01:18, Tod Fitch wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 30, 2020, at 7:57 AM, Rob Savoye wrote: > > > > > >> Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 15:46:31 +0200 > > >> From: Daniel Westergren > > > > > >> *An additional issue

Re: [Tagging] Features underwater (inside reservoirs)

On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 11:47:23AM +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 at 10:22, Lanxana . wrote: > > > Location=underwater [3] -> it seems that it’s appropriate but the > > description tells “installed between a water surface and the floor > > beneath”, it isn’t the case… > > > But see

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

sent from a phone > On 6. Jun 2020, at 03:58, Jack Armstrong wrote: > > > The wiki permits the mapping of reality, on-the-ground, as it is in the world > today. OSM should reflect what exists today, not decades ago. If there is > something that remains of a previous railroad, then it can be

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 at 11:23, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 06/06/2020 16:18, Phake Nick wrote: > 在 2020年6月6日週六 11:03，Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> 寫道： >>> As a general tourist I would have no interest in traveling along a >>> railway route here nothing remains of the railway. >> >> OSM is not *only* f

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

On 06/06/2020 16:18, Phake Nick wrote: 在 2020年6月6日週六 11:03，Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > 寫道： As a general tourist I would have no interest in traveling along a railway route here nothing remains of the railway. OSM is not *only* for general tourist.

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?

在 2020年6月6日週六 11:03，Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> 寫道： > On 6/6/20 8:02 am, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > I need to reopen this thread. > > > > I do object strongly to the invitation to remove the > > razed/dismantled-railway tag in the case of railway tracks have been > > replaced by roads with the s

[Tagging] Education reform - a minor change on my proposal

I have changed how buildings in the campus should be tagged. Yours, faithfully Erkin Alp ___ Tagging mailing l

Re: [Tagging] Features underwater (inside reservoirs)

On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 at 10:22, Lanxana . wrote: We have been looking for how to tag the ruins of constructions (buildings, > bridges or roads) that are inside some reservoirs. Although they generally > remain underwater, but in times of drought, when the reservoir level drops > low enough, they can

[Tagging] Features underwater (inside reservoirs)

Hi everyone! We have been looking for how to tag the ruins of constructions (buildings, bridges or roads) that are inside some reservoirs. Although they generally remain underwater, but in times of drought, when the reservoir level drops low enough, they can be visited on foot. Like this [1] On