i have been to 11 stations in the last 3 weeks, the trains are not doing what
the tags represent
>Tuesday, August 11, 2020 7:25 PM -05:00 from Clay Smalley
>:
>
>You really need to stop calling people's edits "fake". It's disrespectful.
>You're not in a position to determine whether my
You really need to stop calling people's edits "fake". It's disrespectful.
You're not in a position to determine whether my edits were estimation or
actually fictitious data.
It's an especially shitty thing to email me privately to lob personal
attacks at me after it becomes clear the community
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 02:05, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 07:03, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 3. Aug 2020, at 22:10, Tod Fitch wrote:
>> >
>> > Looking at wikipedia, it seems that “storm drain” is used in the UK,
>> Canada and the US [1]. And there is an
>OK ! i will
>
>end thread.
>>Tuesday, August 11, 2020 2:01 PM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
>>tagging@openstreetmap.org >:
>>
>>Aug 11, 2020, 20:49 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>>>
>>>sent from a phone
On 11. Aug 2020, at 19:55, Clay Smalley < claysmal...@gmail.com > wrote:
I’ve not seen a suggestion for this case yet that has any traction. . .
It occurred to me that the area where water flow disappears is indeterminate
[1], thus the problem mapping it.
> Definition of indeterminate:
> 1a : not definitely or precisely determined or fixed : vague
> b : not known in
Aug 11, 2020, 20:49 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 11. Aug 2020, at 19:55, Clay Smalley wrote:
>>
>> We've pointed out concrete steps you can take to improve these
>> initially-mapped stop positions. If mapping stop positions accurately is
>> important to you,
Aug 11, 2020, 19:52 by claysmal...@gmail.com:
> What exactly is your point here? If nobody is responding to your complaints,
> perhaps they aren't worth responding to.
>
Or posted as an unreadable blue text.
> Repeating the same complaints to the same group of people won't change that.
>
>
sent from a phone
> On 11. Aug 2020, at 19:55, Clay Smalley wrote:
>
> We've pointed out concrete steps you can take to improve these
> initially-mapped stop positions. If mapping stop positions accurately is
> important to you, why not take responsibility for improving them?
I agree that
What exactly is your point here? If nobody is responding to your
complaints, perhaps they aren't worth responding to. Repeating the same
complaints to the same group of people won't change that.
Are you worried that incorrectly-mapped stop positions endanger people's
safety?
We've pointed out
this is missing my original talk.
IN the chicago area we have 3 railway company’s operating the system, and one
had signs left up from the old days
which in watching the train come into that stations platform did not stop at
the sign based on the number of cars + the
diesel engines or
10 matches
Mail list logo
