Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

2022-11-03 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
I don't know if people didn't get the message that I had to stop the voting process, because I had to make a change to the proposal page, and if they're not reading the headings on the page. The opening of the voting booths is retracted and you can merrily discuss away. Martin can re-open the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

2022-11-03 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 3 Nov 2022, at 14:39, Sarah Hoffmann via Tagging > wrote: > > Random example: historic=manor. About 77% of objects tagged with > historic=manor have a building=* tag, which makes perfect sense. A manor > is a building after all. So it looks like historic=manor is more

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

2022-11-03 Thread Sarah Hoffmann via Tagging
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 11:56:45AM +, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote: > Hello all, > > Martin is too busy the next couple of days, so with his permission I > have opened the voting booths for the key historic to be approved. The > minimum 2 weeks passed a couple of days ago, and the discussion

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

2022-11-03 Thread Volker Schmidt
I think the best way out is to think detached from the meaning of the strings of characters we use for tagging. Let's document that we have have certain values for the key "historic" that describe objects that are not historic, and not even old. After all the purpose of the wiki is to describe the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

2022-11-03 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
The main issue I have with this proposal is that there is a longstanding controversy regarding the historic key. Namely, the question of whether it is used for things that are historic or merely old. I don't see how a proposal centered around this key can move forward with that fundamental

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

2022-11-03 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
Thanks for pointing that out, I've closed the vote again, and will open again tomorrow. I don't know if that it the procedure when you correct an oversight on the proposal page. Anne On 03/11/2022 12:16, Daniel Capilla wrote: Please, Check the wiki talk page of this proposal before opening

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

2022-11-03 Thread Daniel Capilla
Please, Check the wiki talk page of this proposal before opening the voting time. Some issues are not cleared resolved. Thank you. Regards, Daniel Capilla ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - historic

2022-11-03 Thread Anne-Karoline Distel
Hello all, Martin is too busy the next couple of days, so with his permission I have opened the voting booths for the key historic to be approved. The minimum 2 weeks passed a couple of days ago, and the discussion has died down, so hopefully everyone is ready to vote.

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - Pedagogy

2022-11-03 Thread Dian Ă…gesson
Hello all, Key:Pedagogy [1] has been approved with 12 votes for, 2 votes against and 2 abstentions (link [2]). Thanks to those that contributed and voted. Dian Links: -- [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pedagogy [2]