I read this discussion with interest (as end user) and ignorance
router-wise.
Some unsorted early-morning thoughts on this subject:
When trying to reach a destination that is defined by a complete address
(city, street name, house number or name) is that the last meters of the
route are, potentia
Vào lúc 11:48 2023-06-15, Sarah Hoffmann via Tagging đã viết:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 09:38:44AM -0700, Minh Nguyen wrote:
I neglected to mention another common heuristic: the geocoder can
automatically bias the address point toward the street named in addr:street
when coming up with a navigable
my mistake, it's ok.
Le 16.06.23 à 18:44, wolfy1339 a écrit :
It was posted for the RFC.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2023-March/067118.html
On 2023-06-16 10:01, Marc_marc wrote:
Le 15.06.23 à 16:27, Clay Smalley a écrit :
Voting has started on the proposal to introduce t
Le 15.06.23 à 16:27, Clay Smalley a écrit :
Voting has started on the proposal to introduce the key crossing:whistle=*.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Level_crossing_train_horn_usage
it miss the RFC annoncement on the tagging mailing, so it's invalid and
need restarted at the RFC
Clay Smalley writes:
> Voting has started on the proposal to introduce the key crossing:whistle=*.
I find the "optional" to be strange. Regardless of a "whistles shall
not be blown at this crossing", obviously an engineer can use the horn
at any time if a danger exists. The bit about work crew
Noted.
I was [over]reacting to the section from OP about return periods.
If this proposal is specifically about areas of historical flooding rather
than areas deemed at risk of flooding then they *can* be observed
on-the-ground.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, 01:08 Andy Townsend, wrote:
> On 15/06/2023